Losina Elena, Barrett Jane, Mahomed Nizar N, Baron John A, Katz Jeffrey N
Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health and Robert B. Brigham Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Clinical Research Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr;50(4):1338-43. doi: 10.1002/art.20148.
To determine whether provider volume is associated with early failures following total hip replacement (THR) requiring revision.
Claims data were analyzed to follow a cohort of 57,488 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective primary THR in 1995-1996 in 3,044 hospitals in the US. Patients were followed through the end of 1999. Failure of primary THR was defined as a subsequent revision THR, as determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in hospital claims. Hospitals were stratified into 4 volume groups: low (<25 THRs/year), medium (26-50, 51-100 THRs/year), and high (>100 THRs/year). Low-volume surgeons were defined as those surgeons performing <12 elective primary THRs annually in the Medicare population. Associations between the rates of revision and surgeon volume were determined by hazard ratios from a proportional hazard model, with adjustment for hospital volume, patient age, poverty status, sex, and comorbidities. We also examined whether the effect of surgeon volume on revision rates differed between the first 18 months postoperatively and later time periods.
Among 57,488 patients who had elective primary THR in 1995-1996, 2,537 (4.4%) had at least 1 revision THR by the end of 1999, with 1,437 (56.6%) of these revisions occurring within the first 18 months after the index primary THR. Median followup time was 47 months (range 0-54). Patients of high-volume surgeons were less likely to have revision THRs than patients of low-volume surgeons, regardless of hospital volume stratum. Further analysis revealed that the effect of surgeon volume on revisions was striking in the first 18 months after surgery but was not evident in the subsequent years.
Patients of low-volume surgeons have higher rates of revision THR than patients of high-volume surgeons, particularly within the first 18 months postoperatively. Referring clinicians should consider including surgeon volume among the factors influencing their choice of surgeon for elective THR.
确定实施全髋关节置换术(THR)后需要翻修的早期失败情况是否与术者手术量有关。
分析索赔数据,追踪1995 - 1996年在美国3044家医院接受择期初次THR的57488名医疗保险受益人的队列。对患者随访至1999年底。初次THR失败定义为随后进行翻修THR,这由医院索赔中的《国际疾病分类,第九版》编码确定。医院被分为4个手术量组:低(<25例THR/年)、中(26 - 50例/年、51 - 100例/年)和高(>100例/年)。低手术量外科医生定义为每年在医疗保险人群中进行<12例择期初次THR的外科医生。翻修率与外科医生手术量之间的关联通过比例风险模型的风险比确定,并对医院手术量、患者年龄、贫困状况、性别和合并症进行调整。我们还研究了外科医生手术量对翻修率的影响在术后前18个月和后期是否不同。
在1995 - 1996年接受择期初次THR的57488例患者中,到1999年底,2537例(4.4%)至少进行了1次翻修THR,其中1437例(56.6%)的翻修发生在初次THR后的前18个月内。中位随访时间为47个月(范围0 - 54个月)。无论医院手术量分层如何,高手术量外科医生的患者进行翻修THR的可能性低于低手术量外科医生的患者。进一步分析显示,外科医生手术量对翻修的影响在术后前18个月显著,但在随后几年不明显。
低手术量外科医生的患者进行翻修THR的比率高于高手术量外科医生的患者,尤其是在术后前18个月内。转诊临床医生在选择择期THR的外科医生时,应考虑将外科医生手术量作为影响因素之一。