Kapoula Zoï, Yang Qing, Coubard Olivier, Daunys Gintautas, Orssaud Christophe
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action (LPPA), UMR7124, CNRS-Collège de France, 75005 Paris, France.
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Apr 22;360(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.077.
To explore the 3D visual environment most frequently we make combined saccade-vergence eye movements. We studied the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) on such combined eye movements versus isolated saccade and vergence. In the main experiment, TMS was applied on the rPPC 80, 90 or 100 ms after target onset. In a control experiment, TMS was applied over the primary motor cortex at 90 ms after the target presentation. TMS trials were compared with no-TMS trials. TMS of the motor cortex had no effect at all on eye movements. TMS of the rPPC had no effect on the accuracy of eye movements, but it caused a latency increase: the increase was similar for the two components of the combined saccade-vergence movements, and it did not alter the naturally existing tight relationship of latency between the two components. Furthermore, the amount of latency prolongation was similar to that of isolated vergence, and of saccades in either direction (ipsilateral or contralateral relative to the stimulated site). Latency prolongation was time-specific but in a different way for different types of eye movements: for combined and convergence eye movements, the critical time window was -130 ms or more prior to the onset of eye movement, while for saccades and divergence TMS was disruptive later, -110 ms or more prior to the onset of eye movements. The latency increase is attributed to the interference by the TMS with the fixation disengagement process, for which the rPPC is believed to be instrumental. These results suggest that fixation disengagement occurs earlier for convergence and combined eye movements than for saccades and divergence.
为了最频繁地探索三维视觉环境,我们会进行扫视-聚散联合眼球运动。我们研究了经颅磁刺激(TMS)右侧顶叶后皮质(rPPC)对这种联合眼球运动以及单独的扫视和聚散运动的影响。在主要实验中,在目标出现后80、90或100毫秒对rPPC施加TMS。在对照实验中,在目标呈现后90毫秒对初级运动皮质施加TMS。将TMS试验与无TMS试验进行比较。运动皮质的TMS对眼球运动完全没有影响。rPPC的TMS对眼球运动的准确性没有影响,但它导致了潜伏期增加:联合扫视-聚散运动的两个组成部分的增加是相似的,并且它没有改变两个组成部分之间自然存在的潜伏期紧密关系。此外,潜伏期延长的程度与单独的聚散运动以及向任何一个方向(相对于受刺激部位的同侧或对侧)的扫视运动的程度相似。潜伏期延长具有时间特异性,但对于不同类型的眼球运动方式不同:对于联合和会聚眼球运动,关键时间窗口是眼球运动开始前-130毫秒或更早,而对于扫视和发散运动,TMS在更晚的时候产生干扰,即眼球运动开始前-110毫秒或更早。潜伏期增加归因于TMS对注视脱离过程的干扰,人们认为rPPC在这一过程中起作用。这些结果表明,与扫视和发散运动相比,会聚和联合眼球运动的注视脱离发生得更早。