Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Willmann J K, Crook D W, Marincek B, Boehm T
Department Medical Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Rofo. 2004 Apr;176(4):513-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-812777.
To determine the impact of retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT (MDCT) on three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the bronchial tree and virtual bronchoscopy (VB) as compared to non-ECG-gated data acquisition.
Contrast-enhanced retrospectively ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated MDCT of the chest was performed in 25 consecutive patients referred for assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts and pathology of the ascending aorta. ECG-gated MDCT data were reconstructed in diastole using an absolute reverse delay of - 400 msec in all patients. In 10 patients additional reconstructions at - 200 msec, - 300 msec, and - 500 msec prior to the R-wave were performed. Shaded surface display (SSD) and virtual bronchoscopy (VB) for visualization of the bronchial segments was performed with ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated MDCT data. The visualization of the bronchial tree underwent blinded scoring. Effective radiation dose and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both techniques were compared.
There was no significant difference in visualizing single bronchial segments using ECG-gated compared to non-ECG-gated MDCT data. However, the total sum of scores for all bronchial segments visualized with non-ECG-gated MDCT was significantly higher compared to ECG-gated MDCT (P < 0.05). The summary scores for visualization of bronchial segments for different diastolic reconstructions did not differ significantly. The effective radiation dose and the SNR were significantly higher with the ECG-gated acquisition technique (P < 0.05).
The bronchial tree is significantly better visualized when using non-ECG-gated MDCT compared to ECG-gated MDCT. Additionally, non-ECG-gated techniques require less radiation exposure. Thus, the current retrospective ECG-gating technique does not provide any additional benefit for 3D visualization of the bronchial tree and VB.
与非心电图门控数据采集相比,确定回顾性心电图门控多排螺旋CT(MDCT)对支气管树三维(3D)可视化及虚拟支气管镜检查(VB)的影响。
对连续25例因冠状动脉搭桥术评估及升主动脉病变而转诊的患者进行了胸部对比增强回顾性心电图门控及非心电图门控MDCT检查。所有患者均在舒张期使用-400毫秒的绝对反向延迟重建心电图门控MDCT数据。对10例患者在R波前-200毫秒、-300毫秒和-500毫秒进行了额外重建。使用心电图门控和非心电图门控MDCT数据进行了用于支气管节段可视化的表面阴影显示(SSD)和虚拟支气管镜检查(VB)。对支气管树的可视化进行了盲法评分。比较了两种技术的有效辐射剂量和信噪比(SNR)。
与非心电图门控MDCT数据相比,使用心电图门控观察单个支气管节段时无显著差异。然而,与心电图门控MDCT相比,非心电图门控MDCT可视化的所有支气管节段的总分显著更高(P<0.05)。不同舒张期重建的支气管节段可视化的总结分数无显著差异。心电图门控采集技术的有效辐射剂量和SNR显著更高(P<0.05)。
与心电图门控MDCT相比,使用非心电图门控MDCT时支气管树的可视化明显更好。此外,非心电图门控技术需要的辐射暴露更少。因此,当前的回顾性心电图门控技术对支气管树和VB的3D可视化没有提供任何额外益处。