Suppr超能文献

原发性肺癌的支气管镜姑息治疗:单一治疗还是多模式治疗?

Bronchoscopic palliation of primary lung cancer: single or multimodality therapy?

作者信息

Santos R S, Raftopoulos Y, Keenan R J, Halal A, Maley R H, Landreneau R J

机构信息

Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):931-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9202-x. Epub 2004 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An obstructing primary lung cancer is a challenging disease frequently requiring endobronchial interventional therapy. A variety of interventional modalities, including Nd:YAG laser, stenting, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and endoluminal brachytherapy, are utilized to relieve airway obstruction and bleeding. The aim of this study is to compare the effect on patient survival of bronchoscopic palliation for lung cancer utilizing one interventional modality compared to the use of combination of modalities to relieve the airway problem. METHODS. We reviewed our longitudinal experience with interventional bronchoscopy in 75 patients who underwent 176 procedures for the management of endobronchial lung cancer between 1994 and 2002. Indication for intervention was hemoptysis in 24 patients (32%) and airway obstruction in the remaining. Six patients died within 30 days from the first intervention and were excluded. Forty of the surviving 69 patients (58%) were treated with a single interventional modality (group A). In 29 patients (42%) a multimodality endoscopic treatment was utilized (group B). Single-modality treatment in group A included Nd-YAG laser in 60%, stent in 17%, brachytherapy in 20%, and PDT in 3%. A variety of combinations of the aforementioned modalities were used in group B to enhance airway patency. Patient data were compared with the Student's t-test and chi-square test. Survival analysis and the log rank test were used to compare difference in survival between the two groups. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 46 males and 23 females, with a mean age of 67 years. The tumor was located in the trachea 9%, in the carina in 7%, and primary bronchial in 84%. Two patients had complications due to stent malposition. There was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to age, gender, tumor location, histology, and type of previous cancer therapy. There was a significant improvement in survival for the multimodality group (p = 0.04). The 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rate for groups A and B was 51.3% versus 50% and 2.3% versus 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in survival can be seen with diligent airway surveillance after interventional bronchoscopy and liberal use of a variety of endobronchial treatment modalities for airway obstruction or bleeding. Physicians involved in the management of this difficult problem should be versed in the use of all available treatment modalities to enhance therapeutic outcome.

摘要

背景

阻塞性原发性肺癌是一种具有挑战性的疾病,常需要进行支气管内介入治疗。包括钕钇铝石榴石激光、支架置入、光动力疗法(PDT)和腔内近距离放射治疗在内的多种介入方式被用于缓解气道阻塞和出血。本研究的目的是比较使用一种介入方式与联合使用多种方式缓解气道问题的支气管镜姑息治疗对肺癌患者生存的影响。

方法

我们回顾了1994年至2002年间75例接受176次支气管镜介入治疗以管理支气管内肺癌的患者的纵向经验。介入的指征是24例患者(32%)咯血,其余患者为气道阻塞。6例患者在首次介入后30天内死亡并被排除。在存活的69例患者中,40例(58%)接受了单一介入方式治疗(A组)。29例患者(42%)采用了多模式内镜治疗(B组)。A组的单一模式治疗包括60%的钕钇铝石榴石激光、17%的支架置入、20%的近距离放射治疗和3%的光动力疗法。B组使用了上述多种方式的组合以提高气道通畅性。患者数据采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行比较。生存分析和对数秩检验用于比较两组之间的生存差异。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

男性46例,女性23例,平均年龄67岁。肿瘤位于气管的占9%,位于隆突的占7%,位于主支气管的占84%。2例患者因支架位置不当出现并发症。两组在年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、组织学和既往癌症治疗类型方面无显著差异。多模式组的生存率有显著提高(p = 0.04)。A组和B组的1年和3年累积生存率分别为51.3%对50%和2.3%对22%。

结论

支气管镜介入治疗后通过认真的气道监测以及对气道阻塞或出血广泛使用各种支气管内治疗方式,可以提高生存率。参与处理这一难题的医生应精通所有可用治疗方式的使用,以提高治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验