Suppr超能文献

氯氮平的通用替代:从加拿大视角看的一个简单决策模型

Generic replacement of clozapine: a simple decision model from a Canadian perspective.

作者信息

Layton Stephen, Barbeau Martin

机构信息

Royal Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Apr;20(4):453-9. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003250.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Increased incidence of relapse has been differences in relapse incidence. The difference at reported upon switching patients with schizophrenia from brand name to generic clozapine. The cost of treating relapsed patients could offset the reduced drug acquisition cost associated with switching. A decision model was designed to predict the relapse incidence at which switching to generic clozapine is cost-neutral.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with schizophrenia stabilized on brand name clozapine was considered either to remain on the brand name product, or to switch to the generic version. Medication effectiveness data were taken from two reports following patients who underwent generic replacement of clozapine. Direct costs associated with each treatment were projected from a Canadian Ministry of Health perspective, considering drug acquisition and treatment of relapse. Unit costs were derived from published sources.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Direct costs of the two treatment regimens were compared based on which switching to generic clozapine would result in no direct cost saving was determined.

RESULTS

Switching a patient to generic clozapine would save 1241 Canadian dollars annually if the patient did not relapse, and would cost 9823 Canadian dollars if the patient relapsed. Assuming an 11% difference in relapse for patients taking brand name and generic clozapine, respectively, switching 100 patients to generic clozapine would save 24 Canadian dollars per patient. If the relapse difference for patients taking generic clozapine is 28%, the switch to the generic medication would cost 1857 Canadian dollars per patient. Switching patients from brand name clozapine to generic clozapine was predicted to be neutral to direct costs when the absolute difference in relapse incidence was 11.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to a generic medication may not always reduce direct costs. Physicians, patients and third party payers should consider the potential consequences before instituting generic replacement of clozapine for economic reasons.

摘要

目的

复发率上升一直是报道的从品牌名氯氮平转换为通用名氯氮平的精神分裂症患者复发率差异的原因。治疗复发患者的成本可能抵消与转换相关的降低的药品采购成本。设计了一个决策模型来预测转换为通用名氯氮平时成本中性的复发率。

研究设计与方法

假设一组由100名使用品牌名氯氮平病情稳定的精神分裂症患者组成的队列,考虑继续使用品牌名产品或转换为通用名产品。药物有效性数据取自两份关于接受氯氮平通用名替代患者的报告。从加拿大卫生部的角度预测了与每种治疗相关的直接成本,考虑了药品采购和复发治疗。单位成本来自已发表的资料来源。

主要观察指标

比较两种治疗方案的直接成本,以确定转换为通用名氯氮平不会节省直接成本的情况。

结果

如果患者未复发,将患者转换为通用名氯氮平每年可节省1241加元,如果患者复发,则成本为9823加元。假设分别服用品牌名和通用名氯氮平的患者复发率相差11%,将100名患者转换为通用名氯氮平每位患者可节省24加元。如果服用通用名氯氮平的患者复发率差异为28%,转换为通用名药物每位患者将花费1857加元。当复发率的绝对差异为11.2%时,将患者从品牌名氯氮平转换为通用名氯氮平预计对直接成本无影响。

结论

转换为通用名药物并不总是能降低直接成本。医生、患者和第三方支付者在出于经济原因进行氯氮平通用名替代之前应考虑潜在后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验