Argiris Athanassios, Stenson Kerstin M, Brockstein Bruce E, Mittal Bharat B, Pelzer Harold, Kies Merrill S, Jayaram Prathima, Portugal Louis, Wenig Barry L, Rosen Fred R, Haraf Daniel J, Vokes Everett E
The Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Head Neck. 2004 May;26(5):447-55. doi: 10.1002/hed.10394.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of neck lymph node (ND) in the combined dissection modality therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck.
We identified patients with N2-N3 head and neck cancers who were enrolled in three consecutive multicenter phase II studies of concurrent chemoradiotherapy utilizing 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea on an alternate-week schedule with radiotherapy twice daily plus either cisplatin (C-FHX) or paclitaxel (T-FHX). Patients with unknown primary tumors, nasopharyngeal or paranasal sinus primaries, nonsquamous histology, progression or death during therapy, or incomplete therapy were excluded.
A total of 131 patients were analyzed. Seventy-nine percent had N2 stage. ND was performed in 92 patients (70%), either prior to enrollment (n = 31) or after chemoradiotherapy (n = 61). With a median follow-up of 4.6 years, the 5-year locoregional and neck progression-free survival (PFS) rates were higher in patients with ND versus patients without ND: 88% versus 74% (p =.02) and 99% versus 82% (p =.0007). respectively; there was also a trend toward improved overall survival (OS) with ND, but PFS and distant PFS were comparable. In the subset of patients with N3 disease, ND was associated not only with better locoregional control but also with improved distant PFS. However, in patients with clinical complete response (n = 92), no significant differences in PFS (68% vs 75% at 5 years, p =.53) or any other survival parameters with or without ND were observed.
ND improves neck control and is required for patients with clinically residual disease or N3 neck cancer but has no significant impact on the outcome of patients with N2 stage disease who are rendered clinically disease-free with intensive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
本研究旨在评估颈部淋巴结清扫术在局部晚期头颈部联合清扫方式治疗中的作用。
我们纳入了N2 - N3期头颈部癌患者,这些患者参加了三项连续的多中心II期研究,采用5 - 氟尿嘧啶和羟基脲交替周方案进行同步放化疗,每日放疗两次,联合顺铂(C - FHX)或紫杉醇(T - FHX)。排除原发肿瘤不明、鼻咽癌或鼻窦癌、非鳞状组织学类型、治疗期间进展或死亡或治疗不完整的患者。
共分析了131例患者。79%为N2期。92例患者(70%)进行了颈部淋巴结清扫术,其中31例在入组前进行,61例在放化疗后进行。中位随访4.6年,颈部淋巴结清扫术患者的5年局部区域和颈部无进展生存率(PFS)高于未进行清扫术的患者:分别为88%对74%(p = 0.02)和99%对82%(p = 0.0007);颈部淋巴结清扫术患者的总生存期(OS)也有改善趋势,但PFS和远处无进展生存期相当。在N3期疾病亚组中,颈部淋巴结清扫术不仅与更好的局部区域控制相关,还与改善的远处无进展生存期相关。然而,在临床完全缓解的患者(n = 92)中,未观察到PFS(5年时68%对75%,p = 0.53)或其他生存参数在有无颈部淋巴结清扫术之间存在显著差异。
颈部淋巴结清扫术可改善颈部控制,对于有临床残留疾病或N3期颈部癌的患者是必要的,但对通过强化同步放化疗实现临床无病的N2期疾病患者的预后无显著影响。