Suppr超能文献

基于胶片和数字全景X线摄影的质量。

Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.

作者信息

Molander B, Gröndahl H-G, Ekestubbe A

机构信息

Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Göteborg Public Dental Service, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):32-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17777906.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of panoramic radiographs obtained with storage phosphor plate and screen-film systems.

METHODS

Panoramic radiographs were taken in 60 patients both with film and with a storage phosphor plate system (30 with DenOptix (Dentsply/Gendex) and 30 with Digora PCT). The images were obtained with either the Cranex Tome or the Scanora multimodal X-ray unit. The screen-film combination was Lanex medium/Curix Ortho HT-G. The digital images were displayed as 8-bit images with a 300 dpi resolution on a 19" monitor and the film images were placed on a light box adjacent to the screen. Ten observers evaluated diagnostic image quality by means of visual grading analysis of different anatomical structures. The structures were scored as being visualized much better (5), better (4), equal (3), worse (2) or much worse (1) in the digital images than in the film images. The mean number of patients receiving the different scores was calculated. Statistical methods used were Wilcoxon sign rank test and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

On average, visualization was equal in 19 of the 30 patients imaged using Digora PCT; in 10 it was worse. The corresponding values for DenOptix were 20 and 9. The difference between the film-based and the digital images was small but statistically significant (P<0.0001). The difference between the two image plate systems was not statistically significant (P>/=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that digital panoramic radiographs are equivalent to film-based images for most purposes.

摘要

目的

比较使用存储磷光板系统和屏-片系统获得的全景X线片的图像质量。

方法

对60例患者分别使用胶片和存储磷光板系统(30例使用DenOptix(登士柏/GenDEX),30例使用Digora PCT)拍摄全景X线片。图像通过Cranex Tome或Scanora多模式X线设备获得。屏-片组合为Lanex medium/Curix Ortho HT-G。数字图像以8位图像、300 dpi分辨率在19英寸显示器上显示,胶片图像放置在与屏幕相邻的观片灯上。10名观察者通过对不同解剖结构的视觉分级分析来评估诊断图像质量。对这些结构在数字图像中与胶片图像中的显示情况进行评分,分为明显更好(5分)、更好(4分)、相同(3分)、更差(2分)或明显更差(1分)。计算获得不同分数的患者的平均人数。使用的统计方法为Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney检验。

结果

使用Digora PCT成像的30例患者中,平均有19例的显示效果相同;10例显示效果更差。DenOptix的相应数值为20例和9例。基于胶片的图像与数字图像之间的差异较小,但具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。两种图像板系统之间的差异无统计学意义(P≥0.17)。

结论

得出的结论是,数字全景X线片在大多数情况下与基于胶片的图像相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验