Suppr超能文献

德国的蜱传脑炎——流行病学数据、风险区域的发展以及野外采集的蜱和从人体移除的蜱中的病毒流行情况

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Germany--epidemiological data, development of risk areas and virus prevalence in field-collected ticks and in ticks removed from humans.

作者信息

Süss Jochen, Schrader Christina, Falk Ulrich, Wohanka Nikolaus

机构信息

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, National Reference Laboratory for Tick-borne Diseases, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Med Microbiol. 2004 Apr;293 Suppl 37:69-79. doi: 10.1016/s1433-1128(04)80011-1.

Abstract

In Germany, 100-300 autochthonous clinical TBE cases have been recorded annually. There are high-risk areas in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and ongoing low-risk areas in Hesse, Thuringia, and the Rhineland-Palatinate and single cases in Saxony. In order to be able to evaluate the epidemiological changes described here, it must be mentioned that a new definition of TBE risk areas was introduced on the district level in 1998 in Germany and in 2001 with the new Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz) which states that TBE is a notifiable disease. This led to the replacement of earlier surveillance systems and to many changes to data collection. In 1998 63 country and town districts were TBE risk areas, in 2001 79 and in 2002 86. There were new risk districts within Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and outside these regions in Thuringia, Hesse and the Rhineland-Palatinate. An interesting trend was observed in TBE epidemiology. The TBE incidence in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg has been stable on a high level for years; outside these areas it has steadily been climbing (Odenwald, Thuringia). On the basis of epidemiological data on TBE from the eastern part of Germany since 1960, it is obvious that major changes in virus activity in TBE risk areas also occurred in the past, the explanation of which has remained a matter for speculation. The epidemiological situation in the different risk areas for TBE in Germany was found to vary considerably, if one considers the surveillance data of the last 40 years. 1. Establishment of completely new low-risk areas. 2. Reactivation of formerly active areas with endemic latency. 3. High-risk areas with stable viral activity over long periods. 4. High-risk areas which have expanded and merged with low-risk areas. 5. High-risk areas which have developed into endemic areas or become inactive. High-risk TBE areas from 1960-1975 (i.e. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) have since completely disappeared. There were, at the same time, high-risk areas in Thuringia which had only become latent and have now obviously become active again. The Odenwald demonstrated growing virus activity in the 1990s. These changes in TBE activity in German risk areas over more than the last 40 years are presented schematically. This ongoing number of risk areas is certainly linked to the notification obligation and greater public awareness. Nevertheless, any effects of ecological and climatic changes on the natural foci cannot be ruled out nor can changes in human leisure behaviour. Local weather conditions also have a major effect on the TBE incidence. Warm and dry summers may cause low tick activities, rainy summers may lead to low exposure rates of human beings. Even changes in forms of agricultural production prompted by different political structures probably have an impact as do economic constraints which may lead to lower vaccination and higher exposure rates. Regular, systematic virus prevalence measurements from 1997 to 2002 in field-collected ticks in German high-risk areas do not indicate any risk increase nor do they suggest a downward trend. Studies on virus prevalence in questing versus partially engorged ticks indicate that we neither exactly know nor understand the real quantitative relations between the virus and the host. In a first study, virus prevalence in Ixodes ricinus removed from humans was examined. Humans which were exposed in some districts near Passau in Bavaria. In the autumn of 2001, virus prevalence of unengorged free-living nymphs (n = 820) in this area was 0.38 (0.08-1.1)% and of adults (n = 90) 1.17 (0.03-6.38)%. Surprisingly, virus prevalence in partially engorged ticks from the same area collected during the same period was significantly higher (nymphs, n = 86, 6.9% and adults, n = 129, 9.3%). Virus-positive partially engorged ticks were only found in districts known as risk areas. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence data of the PCR products have confirmed the presence of virus prototype Neudoerfl only.

摘要

在德国,每年记录有100 - 300例本土蜱传脑炎(TBE)临床病例。巴伐利亚州和巴登 - 符腾堡州存在高风险地区,黑森州、图林根州、莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨州存在持续的低风险地区,萨克森州有个别病例。为了能够评估此处描述的流行病学变化,必须提及德国于1998年在地区层面引入了TBE风险地区的新定义,并于2001年随着新的《感染保护法》(Infektionsschutzgesetz)将TBE列为须通报的疾病。这导致了早期监测系统的更替以及数据收集方面的诸多变化。1998年有63个乡村和城镇地区为TBE风险地区,2001年为79个,2002年为86个。在巴伐利亚州和巴登 - 符腾堡州以及图林根州、黑森州和莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨州这些地区之外出现了新的风险地区。在TBE流行病学中观察到一个有趣的趋势。巴伐利亚州和巴登 - 符腾堡州的TBE发病率多年来一直稳定在较高水平;在这些地区之外,发病率一直在稳步攀升(奥登瓦尔德,图林根州)。根据自1960年以来德国东部地区TBE的流行病学数据,很明显过去TBE风险地区的病毒活动也发生了重大变化,对此的解释仍属猜测。如果考虑过去40年的监测数据,德国不同TBE风险地区的流行病学情况差异很大。1. 全新低风险地区的形成。2. 以前有地方病潜伏期的活跃地区重新活跃。3. 病毒活动长期稳定的高风险地区。4. 已扩大并与低风险地区合并的高风险地区。5. 已发展成为地方病流行地区或不再活跃的高风险地区。1960 - 1975年的高风险TBE地区(即梅克伦堡 - 前波美拉尼亚)此后已完全消失。与此同时,图林根州曾处于潜伏状态的高风险地区现在显然又重新活跃起来。奥登瓦尔德在20世纪90年代显示出病毒活动增加。德国风险地区过去40多年来TBE活动的这些变化以示意图形式呈现。这种持续增加的风险地区数量肯定与通报义务以及公众意识提高有关。然而,不能排除生态和气候变化对自然疫源地的任何影响,也不能排除人类休闲行为的变化。当地天气状况对TBE发病率也有重大影响。温暖干燥夏季可能导致蜱虫活动减少,多雨夏季可能导致人类接触率降低。不同政治结构引发的农业生产形式变化可能也有影响,经济限制可能导致疫苗接种率降低和接触率升高。1997年至2002年在德国高风险地区野外采集的蜱虫中进行的定期、系统的病毒流行率测量既未表明风险增加,也未显示出下降趋势。对正在寻找宿主的蜱虫与部分饱血蜱虫的病毒流行率研究表明,我们既不完全了解也不明白病毒与宿主之间真正的定量关系。在第一项研究中,检查了从人类身上采集的蓖麻硬蜱的病毒流行率。在巴伐利亚州帕绍附近的一些地区有人类接触蜱虫的情况。2001年秋季,该地区未饱血的自由生活若虫(n = 820)的病毒流行率为0.38(0.08 - 1.1)%,成虫(n = 90)为1.17(0.03 - 6.38)%。令人惊讶的是,同期从同一地区采集的部分饱血蜱虫的病毒流行率明显更高(若虫,n = 86,6.9%;成虫,n = 129,9.3%)。仅在已知为风险地区的区域发现了病毒阳性的部分饱血蜱虫。PCR产物的核苷酸和推导氨基酸序列数据仅证实了病毒原型Neudoerfl的存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验