Quant Sylvia, Adkin Allan L, Staines W Richard, Maki Brian E, McIlroy William E
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
BMC Neurosci. 2004 May 17;5:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-18.
Although previous studies suggest that postural control requires attention and other cognitive resources, the central mechanisms responsible for this relationship remain unclear. To address this issue, we examined the effects of altered attention on cortical activity and postural responses following mechanical perturbations to upright stance. We hypothesized that cortical activity would be attenuated but not delayed when mechanical perturbations were applied during a concurrent performance of a cognitive task (i.e. when attention was directed away from the perturbation). We also hypothesized that these cortical changes would be accompanied by alterations in the postural response, as evidenced by increases in the magnitude of anteroposterior (AP) centre of pressure (COP) peak displacements and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle activity. Healthy young adults (n = 7) were instructed to continuously track (cognitive task) or not track (control task) a randomly moving visual target using a hand-held joystick. During each of these conditions, unpredictable translations of a moving floor evoked cortical and postural responses. Scalp-recorded cortical activity, COP, and TA electromyographic (EMG) measures were collected.
Results revealed a significant decrease in the magnitude of early cortical activity (the N1 response, the first negative peak after perturbation onset) during the tracking task compared to the control condition. More pronounced AP COP peak displacements and EMG magnitudes were also observed for the tracking task and were possibly related to changes in the N1 response.
Based on previous notions that the N1 response represents sensory processing of the balance disturbance, we suggest that the attenuation of the N1 response is an important central mechanism that may provide insight into the relationship between attention and postural control.
尽管先前的研究表明姿势控制需要注意力和其他认知资源,但负责这种关系的中枢机制仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了注意力改变对直立姿势受到机械扰动后的皮层活动和姿势反应的影响。我们假设,当在执行认知任务的同时施加机械扰动时(即当注意力从扰动上转移开时),皮层活动会减弱但不会延迟。我们还假设这些皮层变化会伴随着姿势反应的改变,这表现为前后(AP)压力中心(COP)峰值位移的幅度和胫骨前肌(TA)肌肉活动增加。健康的年轻成年人(n = 7)被指示使用手持操纵杆持续跟踪(认知任务)或不跟踪(对照任务)一个随机移动的视觉目标。在每种情况下,移动地板的不可预测平移都会诱发皮层和姿势反应。收集头皮记录的皮层活动、COP和TA肌电图(EMG)测量值。
结果显示,与对照条件相比,跟踪任务期间早期皮层活动的幅度(N1反应,扰动开始后的第一个负峰)显著降低。跟踪任务中还观察到更明显的AP COP峰值位移和EMG幅度,并且可能与N1反应的变化有关。
基于先前认为N1反应代表平衡干扰的感觉处理的观点,我们认为N1反应的减弱是一种重要的中枢机制,可能有助于深入了解注意力与姿势控制之间的关系。