Uren Tanya H, Szabó Marianna, Lovibond Peter F
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(4):481-98. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6185(03)00028-8.
Individuals with Social Phobia (SP) (n = 23) and Panic Disorder (n = 22), and a non-anxious comparison (NAC) group (n = 62) rated the probability and cost of negative outcomes in the physical and the social domains. Overall, participants rated physical events as less probable but more costly than social events. Compared to the non-anxious group, participants with Social Phobia made significantly higher probability and cost estimates for social events, but not for physical events. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that perceived cost of negative social events was the strongest unique predictor of scores on the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNE). Participants with Panic Disorder made significantly higher probability and cost estimates for both physical and social outcomes, compared to non-anxious participants. Both physical probability and social cost estimates predicted scores on the Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ). Findings support the disorder-specificity of cognitive biases in Social Phobia, but suggest that individuals with Panic Disorder have a wider range of judgment biases than previously thought.
社交恐惧症(SP)患者(n = 23)、惊恐障碍患者(n = 22)以及非焦虑对照组(NAC)(n = 62)对身体和社交领域负面结果的可能性及代价进行了评估。总体而言,参与者认为身体事件发生的可能性较小,但代价高于社交事件。与非焦虑组相比,社交恐惧症患者对社交事件的可能性和代价估计显著更高,但对身体事件则不然。多元回归分析表明,负面社交事件的感知代价是负面评价恐惧量表(FNE)得分最强的独特预测因素。与非焦虑参与者相比,惊恐障碍患者对身体和社交结果的可能性和代价估计均显著更高。身体可能性和社交代价估计均能预测身体感觉问卷(BSQ)的得分。研究结果支持社交恐惧症认知偏差的障碍特异性,但表明惊恐障碍患者的判断偏差范围比之前认为的更广。