Nair Pn P n Ramachandran, Schug Jens
Institute of Oral Biology, Section of Oral Structures and Development, University of Zurich Center of Dental and Oral Medicine, Switzerland.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 May;97(5):559-69. doi: 10.1016/S1079210403006334.
The objective was to conduct a clinical, radiographic, and histologic follow-up of alveolar socket healing in 8 human cases in which the extraction sockets of the involved teeth were treated with biodegradable root replicas before metallic implants were placed.
Chair side prepared solid and porous forms of root replicas made out of polylactic-polyglycolic acids (PLGA) copolymer were utilized. Five patients were treated with the solid form and 3 with the porous form of the replicas. The cases were followed up at regular intervals postoperatively, and standardized photographs and radiographs were taken. The cylindrical core of biopsies that were removed with trephine for placement of titanium implants were processed and examined by light and transmission-electron microscopy.
Both forms of the root replicas were well tolerated and biodegraded by the body. There were no histologically observable pathological tissue reactions at the time of implant application. However, the solid form seemed to cause an initial decalcification of the bone surrounding the extraction sockets that was subsequently repaired along with the bone healing of the extraction sockets. Such initial decalcification of the alveolar process was not observed in the cases that were treated with the porous form of root replicas. There was wide variation in the osseous component of the trephine-harvested biopsies in both treatment groups that suggests inconsistency in bone healing of the alveolar sockets.
The 2 forms of root replicas under investigation were found to be biocompatible and biodegradable. But the compact solid form may cause an initial temporary lactic acid induced decalcification of the alveolar process, which makes it unsuitable for regular clinical application as compared to the granular porous form. The observed inconsistent and unpredictable bone regeneration calls for further research to develop more optimal replica materials.
对8例人类病例的牙槽窝愈合情况进行临床、影像学和组织学随访。在这些病例中,在植入金属种植体之前,用可生物降解的牙根复制品对患牙的拔牙窝进行了处理。
使用椅旁制备的由聚乳酸-聚乙醇酸(PLGA)共聚物制成的实心和多孔形式的牙根复制品。5例患者接受了实心形式的复制品治疗,3例接受了多孔形式的复制品治疗。术后定期对病例进行随访,并拍摄标准化照片和X线片。用环钻取出用于植入钛种植体的活检组织的圆柱形核心,进行处理并通过光镜和透射电子显微镜检查。
两种形式的牙根复制品均耐受性良好且可被机体生物降解。在植入种植体时,组织学上未观察到病理性组织反应。然而,实心形式似乎导致拔牙窝周围的骨初始脱钙,随后随着拔牙窝的骨愈合而修复。在用多孔形式的牙根复制品治疗的病例中未观察到牙槽突的这种初始脱钙。两个治疗组中环钻获取的活检组织的骨成分存在很大差异,这表明牙槽窝的骨愈合不一致。
所研究的两种形式的牙根复制品具有生物相容性且可生物降解。但致密的实心形式可能会导致牙槽突初始暂时的乳酸诱导脱钙,与颗粒状多孔形式相比,这使其不适合常规临床应用。观察到的不一致且不可预测的骨再生需要进一步研究以开发更优化的复制品材料。