Starkl Markus, Brunner Norbert
Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Pollution Control, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
J Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;71(3):245-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.03.004.
Decision making in urban water management is exemplified by the case of Austria: Although researchers define a comprehensible concept of sustainability, practitioners emphasize feasibility and accept limitations in sustainability. Could the specification of particular methods, chosen from some decision support methodology, remedy this situation? While an integrative assessment of sustainability should not be based on prescribed or standardized criteria, or even a certain assessment method, it should force the decision makers to make their chosen premise more visible. To this end a change of the decision making process is proposed, which will allow the decision makers to adapt the decision making process to the circumstances of a specific project in a way that is accepted by the stakeholders.
尽管研究人员定义了一个可理解的可持续性概念,但从业者强调可行性并接受可持续性方面的局限性。从某些决策支持方法中选择特定方法的规范能否改善这种情况?虽然对可持续性的综合评估不应基于规定的或标准化的标准,甚至不应基于某种特定的评估方法,但它应促使决策者使其所选择的前提更加明显。为此,提出了决策过程的变革,这将使决策者能够以利益相关者认可的方式根据特定项目的情况调整决策过程。