Lemmers Richard J L F, van der Wielen Michiel J R, Bakker Egbert, Padberg George W, Frants Rune R, van der Maarel Silvère M
Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Neurol. 2004 Jun;55(6):845-50. doi: 10.1002/ana.20106.
Autosomal dominant facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD1A) is associated with contractions of the polymorphic D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4qter. The disease has a high frequency of new mutations of mitotic origin. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-based studies show that mitotic mutations leading to somatic mosaicism occur equally frequently in patients and parents. Nevertheless, somatic mosaicism in FSHD is mainly reported in asymptomatic parents by applying standard Southern analysis after linear gel electrophoresis. Explaining this apparent discrepancy, we here demonstrate that somatic mosaicism in FSHD patients goes largely undetected using the standard diagnostic technique, indicating that linear electrophoresis is unsuitable to identify mosaic patients. As a consequence, the phenotype of mosaic patient's offspring will be underestimated, whereas the recurrence risk in the symptomatic mosaic individuals will be overestimated. Moreover, somatic mosaicism may partly explain the observation of anticipation in de novo kindreds. Therefore, clinicians should always consider pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis in de novo FSHD families, in particular when the patient's phenotype is much milder than expected based on D4Z4 length proper.
常染色体显性面肩肱型肌营养不良症(FSHD1A)与4号染色体长臂末端多态性D4Z4重复序列的收缩有关。该疾病有较高频率的有丝分裂起源的新突变。基于脉冲场凝胶电泳的研究表明,导致体细胞嵌合的有丝分裂突变在患者和父母中出现的频率相同。然而,通过线性凝胶电泳后的标准Southern分析,FSHD中的体细胞嵌合主要在无症状的父母中被报道。为了解释这一明显差异,我们在此证明,使用标准诊断技术在很大程度上无法检测到FSHD患者中的体细胞嵌合,这表明线性电泳不适用于识别嵌合患者。因此,嵌合患者后代的表型会被低估,而有症状的嵌合个体的复发风险会被高估。此外,体细胞嵌合可能部分解释了在新发家族中观察到的遗传早现现象。因此,临床医生在新发FSHD家族中应始终考虑进行脉冲场凝胶电泳分析,特别是当患者的表型比基于D4Z4长度预期的要温和得多时。