Suppr超能文献

重症监护体验:ICE问卷的编制

The intensive care experience: development of the ICE questionnaire.

作者信息

Rattray Janice, Johnston Marie, Wildsmith J A W

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, Tayside, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03066.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that patients' reported memories of intensive care are often of unpleasant events which are described as frightening and persecutory in nature. Currently, there is no standardized way of assessing perceptions of such an experience or relating it to long-term outcome.

AIMS

This paper describes the development of an intensive care experience questionnaire which aims to (a) identify the domains of such an experience, (b) assess and quantify that experience, and (c) explore its impact on short- and long-term emotional outcome.

METHODS

Data from two studies are reported. Participants were non-elective patients and > or =18 years of age with an ICU stay > or =24 hours. Study 1 (n = 34) generated and developed items. Study 2 (n = 109) allowed evaluation of the factor analytic structure and psychometrics of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

From a set of 31 items, exploratory factor analysis identified four components of the intensive care experience: 'awareness of surroundings' (nine items), 'frightening experiences' (six items), 'recall of experience' (five items), and 'satisfaction with care' (four items). Cronbach's alpha statistics were acceptable for each component (0.71-0.93). Correlational analysis with the subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale demonstrated concurrent and univariate predictive validity. The intensive care experience was associated with adverse emotional outcome in both the short- and long-term.

DISCUSSION

The intensive care experience questionnaire identified four dimensions of experience and performed satisfactorily in these developmental analyses. Further study of an independent intensive care unit data set is necessary to confirm these findings, including the four-component structure. Development of a standardized measure provides the opportunity to increase our understanding of the intensive care experience. The questionnaire may be useful to inform the development of effective interventions to improve subsequent outcomes for these patients.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,患者所报告的重症监护记忆往往是不愉快事件,其本质被描述为令人恐惧和受迫害的。目前,尚无标准化方法来评估对这种经历的认知,或将其与长期结果相关联。

目的

本文描述了重症监护经历问卷的开发,该问卷旨在(a)确定这种经历的领域,(b)评估并量化该经历,以及(c)探究其对短期和长期情绪结果的影响。

方法

报告了两项研究的数据。参与者为非择期患者,年龄≥18岁,在重症监护病房停留≥24小时。研究1(n = 34)生成并开发项目。研究2(n = 109)对问卷的因素分析结构和心理测量学进行评估。

结果

从一组31个项目中,探索性因素分析确定了重症监护经历的四个组成部分:“对周围环境的意识”(9个项目)、“可怕的经历”(6个项目)、“对经历的回忆”(5个项目)和“对护理的满意度”(4个项目)。每个组成部分的克朗巴哈α统计量均可接受(0.71 - 0.93)。与医院焦虑抑郁量表和事件影响量表子量表的相关性分析证明了同时效度和单变量预测效度。重症监护经历在短期和长期均与不良情绪结果相关。

讨论

重症监护经历问卷确定了经历的四个维度,并且在这些开发分析中表现良好。有必要对独立的重症监护病房数据集进行进一步研究以证实这些发现,包括四成分结构。标准化测量的开发为增进我们对重症监护经历的理解提供了机会。该问卷可能有助于为开发有效的干预措施提供信息,以改善这些患者的后续结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验