Williams Rhys, Rapport Frances, Elwyn Glyn, Lloyd Brendan, Rance Jaynie, Belcher Sally
Swansea Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea.
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Jul;54(504):531-5.
Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes is now possible with lifestyle or pharmacological interventions in people who are at risk. Primary care would seem to be the legitimate setting for this to take place.
To explore the views of general practitioners and practice nurses about the detection and management of people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
Qualitative study.
One local health board area in Wales.
General practitioners and practice nurses participated in multi-professional focus groups, and opinions of participants were analysed into themes and sub-themes according to focus group content analysis methodology to search for 'markers of text'.
Participants from 21 practices were involved. Participants' opinions on the detection and management of individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes were polarised into those who considered these activities inappropriate for primary care and those who were already engaged in the detection, management and follow-up of these individuals. For the former, existing workload, the questionable role of primary care as a 'screening service', lack of resources, and conflict and concern about increasing specialisation were given as justification. Those already engaged in these activities emphasised their importance but were also concerned with the lack of available resources. Other concerns were the perceived low motivation of patients to modify their lifestyle and the unnecessary medicalisation of the precursor conditions of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia. The prevention of type 2 diabetes was seen as largely the responsibility of other agencies such as health promotion and education.
The often strongly held views about this topic are at least partly influenced by current pressures on primary care. To make the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes a reality, either practitioners need to be motivated and resourced to carry out preventive strategies or alternative methods must be identified.
对于有风险的人群,现在可以通过生活方式干预或药物干预来进行2型糖尿病的一级预防。基层医疗似乎是开展此项工作的合理场所。
探讨全科医生和执业护士对于2型糖尿病高危人群的检测与管理的看法。
定性研究。
威尔士的一个地方卫生委员会辖区。
全科医生和执业护士参与多专业焦点小组讨论,根据焦点小组内容分析方法,将参与者的意见分析为主题和子主题,以寻找“文本标记”。
来自21家医疗机构的参与者参与了研究。参与者对于2型糖尿病高危人群的检测与管理的意见两极分化,一部分人认为这些活动不适合基层医疗,另一部分人则已经在对这些人群进行检测、管理和随访。对于前者,他们以现有工作量、基层医疗作为“筛查服务”的可疑作用、资源匮乏以及对专业化程度提高的冲突和担忧作为理由。那些已经参与这些活动的人强调其重要性,但也担心资源不足。其他担忧包括患者改变生活方式的积极性被认为较低,以及糖耐量受损和空腹血糖受损等前驱疾病存在不必要的医学化现象。2型糖尿病的预防在很大程度上被视为健康促进和教育等其他机构的责任。
关于这个话题的强烈观点至少部分受到当前基层医疗压力的影响。要使2型糖尿病的一级预防成为现实,要么激励从业者并为其提供资源以实施预防策略,要么必须找到替代方法。