Suppr超能文献

伯格平衡量表的评分量表分析。

Rating scale analysis of the Berg Balance Scale.

作者信息

Kornetti Diana L, Fritz Stacy L, Chiu Yi-Po, Light Kathye E, Velozo Craig A

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Box 100154, UFHSC, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;85(7):1128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine, using Rasch analysis, the rating scale performance of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and to describe the 45/56 cutoff score in functional terms.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of BBS scores. Rasch rating scale analysis was performed on these data.

SETTING

Outpatient Veterans Affairs medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred (99 men, 1 woman) community-dwelling veterans referred for balance deficits (age range, 64-88y).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The BBS.

RESULTS

Condensing item-rating categories allowed the elimination of underutilized categories and constructed categories that better separated people of differing abilities. Rating pivot points were developed for each item to represent a transition between passing and failing. Following pivot-point development and rating scale rescoring, person and item measures became more evenly distributed across the BBS and resulted in changes in item difficulty order. In our sample, functional indicators of a score of at least 45/56 were a rating of passing the item "tandem stance," as well as passing 2 of the following 3 items: "alternating foot," "standing on one leg," and "look behind."

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide direction for improving the rating scale structure for each of the items and establish a connection between the BBS cutoff score of 45/56 and functional ability.

摘要

目的

运用拉施分析来检验伯格平衡量表(BBS)的评分量表性能,并从功能角度描述45/56的截断分数。

设计

对BBS评分进行回顾性图表审查。对这些数据进行拉施评分量表分析。

地点

退伍军人事务部门诊医疗中心。

参与者

100名(99名男性,1名女性)因平衡功能障碍前来就诊的社区居住退伍军人(年龄范围64 - 88岁)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

BBS。

结果

合并项目 - 评分类别可消除未充分利用的类别,并构建能更好区分不同能力者的类别。为每个项目制定评分转折点以代表通过与未通过之间的转变。在转折点制定和评分量表重新计分后,人员和项目测量在BBS上分布更均匀,并导致项目难度顺序发生变化。在我们的样本中,得分至少为45/56的功能指标是通过“前后脚并拢站立”项目,以及通过以下3个项目中的2个:“交替踏步”、“单腿站立”和“向后看”。

结论

我们的研究结果为改进每个项目的评分量表结构提供了方向,并建立了BBS 45/56截断分数与功能能力之间的联系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验