Wallace Michael J, Madoff David C, Ahrar Kamran, Warneke Carla L
Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):337-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20367.
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement has emerged as an effective and minimally invasive method of treating portal hypertension and its associated complications. To the authors' knowledge there is limited documentation of its use for percutaneous shunting in patients with hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies. The current study reports the authors' experience with TIPS in the oncology setting.
Thirty-eight patients with cancer underwent TIPS procedures. Nineteen patients had a history of hepatic malignancy. All medical records and imaging studies were reviewed retrospectively. The indication for TIPS, the presence of malignancy, procedural details, complications, survival, and treatment success were assessed.
Primary technical success was accomplished in 37 of 38 patients (97%) without technical procedure-related complications. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 15 of 34 patients (44%), with 3 patients requiring shunt reduction. Premature shunt occlusion (< 30 days) occurred in 3 patients (8%). Recurrent hemorrhage occurred in 1 of 19 patients (5%), and ascites and hepatic hydrothorax resolved or improved subjectively in 9 of 12 patients (75%). Shunts traversed malignancy in 9 patients, and varying degrees of portal compromise were encountered in 12 patients (32%). The overall 30-day and 90-day survival rates were 84% and 60%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in 90-day survival rates for patients who had ascites and hepatic hydrothorax indications (27%) compared with patients who had variceal and portal gastropathy indications (84%; P = 0.0075). In addition, the 90-day survival rate was significantly lower in patients who had primary hepatic malignancies (36%) compared with the remainder of the study population (74%; P = 0.0077), and it was significantly lower in patients who had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores > or = 12 (P = 0.0020).
TIPS was performed safely for patients with cancer without increasing rates of procedure-related complications. However, some patients subgroups, such at those with malignancy and ascites, primary hepatic malignancy, or MELD scores > or = 12, had the lowest 90-day survival rates.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)已成为治疗门静脉高压及其相关并发症的一种有效且微创的方法。据作者所知,关于其在肝内和肝外恶性肿瘤患者经皮分流中的应用记录有限。本研究报告了作者在肿瘤学环境中应用TIPS的经验。
38例癌症患者接受了TIPS手术。19例患者有肝恶性肿瘤病史。对所有病历和影像学研究进行回顾性分析。评估TIPS的适应证、恶性肿瘤的存在情况、手术细节、并发症、生存率和治疗成功率。
38例患者中有37例(97%)取得了初步技术成功,且无技术相关并发症。34例患者中有15例(44%)发生肝性脑病,其中3例需要降低分流。3例患者(8%)发生分流过早闭塞(<30天)。19例患者中有1例(5%)发生再出血,12例患者中有9例(75%)腹水和肝性胸水主观上得到缓解或改善。9例患者的分流穿过恶性肿瘤,12例患者(32%)出现不同程度的门静脉受压。30天和90天的总生存率分别为84%和60%。有腹水和肝性胸水适应证的患者90天生存率(27%)与有静脉曲张和门静脉胃病适应证的患者(84%)相比有统计学显著差异(P = 0.0075)。此外,原发性肝恶性肿瘤患者的90天生存率(36%)显著低于研究人群的其余部分(74%;P = 0.0077),终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分≥12的患者90天生存率也显著较低(P = 0.0020)。
TIPS对癌症患者的实施是安全的,且不增加手术相关并发症的发生率。然而,一些患者亚组(如有恶性肿瘤和腹水、原发性肝恶性肿瘤或MELD评分≥12的患者)90天生存率最低。