Kakegawa Wataru, Tsuzuki Keisuke, Yoshida Yukari, Kameyama Kimihiko, Ozawa Seiji
Department of Neurophysiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jul;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03461.x.
Hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons receive synaptic inputs from both mossy fibres (MFs) and associational fibres (AFs). Long-term potentiation (LTP) at these synapses differs in its induction sites and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) dependence. Most evidence favours the presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms for induction of MF LTP and AF LTP, respectively. This implies that molecular and functional properties differ between MF and AF synapses at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. In this study, we focused on the difference in the postsynaptic trafficking of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) between these synapses. To trace the subunit-specific trafficking of AMPARs at each synapse, GluR1 and GluR2 subunits were introduced into CA3 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal organotypic cultures using the Sindbis viral expression system. The electrophysiologically-tagged GluR2 AMPARs, produced by the viral-mediated transfer of the unedited form of GluR2 (GluR2Q), were inserted into both MF and AF postsynaptic sites in a neuronal activity-independent manner. Endogenous Ca(2+)-impermeable AMPARs at these synapses were replaced with exogenous Ca(2+)-permeable receptors, and Ca(2+) influx via the newly expressed postsynaptic AMPARs induced NMDAR-independent LTP at AF synapses. In contrast, no GluR1 AMPAR produced by the gene transfer was constitutively incorporated into AF postsynaptic sites, and only a small amount into MF postsynaptic sites. The synaptic trafficking of GluR1 AMPARs was triggered by the activity of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II or high-frequency stimulation to induce LTP at AF synapses, but not at MF synapses. These results indicate that MF and AF postsynaptic sites possess distinct properties for AMPAR trafficking in CA3 pyramidal neurons.
海马体CA3区锥体神经元接收来自苔藓纤维(MFs)和联合纤维(AFs)的突触输入。这些突触处的长时程增强(LTP)在其诱导位点和N - 甲基 - D - 天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)依赖性方面存在差异。大多数证据分别支持MF LTP和AF LTP诱导的突触前和突触后机制。这意味着MF和AF突触在突触前和突触后位点的分子和功能特性不同。在本研究中,我们聚焦于这些突触之间α - 氨基 - 3 - 羟基 - 5 - 甲基 - 4 - 异恶唑丙酸受体(AMPARs)突触后转运的差异。为了追踪每个突触处AMPARs的亚基特异性转运,使用辛德毕斯病毒表达系统将GluR1和GluR2亚基导入海马器官型培养物中的CA3锥体神经元。由病毒介导的未编辑形式的GluR2(GluR2Q)转移产生的电生理标记的GluR2 AMPARs,以与神经元活动无关的方式插入到MF和AF突触后位点。这些突触处的内源性Ca(2 +)不可渗透的AMPARs被外源性Ca(2 +)可渗透的受体取代,并且通过新表达的突触后AMPARs的Ca(2 +)内流在AF突触处诱导了不依赖NMDAR的LTP。相反,基因转移产生的GluR1 AMPARs没有组成性地整合到AF突触后位点,仅少量整合到MF突触后位点。GluR1 AMPARs的突触转运由Ca(2 +)/钙调蛋白依赖性激酶II的活性或高频刺激触发,以在AF突触处诱导LTP,但在MF突触处不诱导。这些结果表明,MF和AF突触后位点在CA3锥体神经元中对于AMPAR转运具有不同的特性。