Gräf M
Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Jul;221(7):557-65. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-812893.
Visual acuity can be assessed by different strategies. The constant-stimulus-, the stair-case-, the Best-PEST-strategies, and the EN ISO 8596 are discussed. In cases of presumed psychogenic visual impairment and malingering it can be useful to modify these strategies striving for a determination of the (minimum) visual acuity based on statistical analysis rather than "clinical experience". The EN ISO 8596 defines visual acuity by a 60 % criterion, thus implying guesswork, if recognition of the optotypes is uncertain. Therefore, the forced-choice-procedure is mandatory. Objective psychophysical (preferential looking, induction or suppression of rhythmic eye movements) and electrophysiological methods (VEP) of visual acuity assessment can be useful in infants, in the mentally handicapped, and in patients with presumed psychogenical influence or malingering.
视力可通过不同策略进行评估。本文讨论了恒刺激法、阶梯法、最佳PEST法以及EN ISO 8596。在疑似精神性视力损害和诈病的情况下,调整这些策略以基于统计分析而非“临床经验”来确定(最小)视力可能会有所帮助。EN ISO 8596以60%的标准定义视力,因此在视标识别不确定时意味着存在猜测成分。所以,强制选择程序是必不可少的。客观心理物理学方法(优先注视、节律性眼球运动的诱导或抑制)和视力评估的电生理方法(视觉诱发电位)在婴儿、智力障碍者以及疑似受精神因素影响或诈病的患者中可能会有用。