Jordan N, Sagar H J, Cooper J A
Department of Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;55(8):658-64. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.8.658.
Studies of reaction time in Parkinson's disease (PD) have suggested a selective deficit in simple reaction time (SRT), compared with choice reaction time (CRT). This finding has been interpreted as a deficit in motor preprogramming but could involve other factors, such as attentional focussing and stimulus predictability. Moreover, not all studies show the same selective deficit, possibly because of differences in patient selection and treatment effects. The neurochemical basis of RT deficits in PD remains unclear. Accordingly, the contribution of cognitive factors to impaired RT was assessed in a large group of PD patients, including early untreated cases, and performance was examined in relation to clinical variables and the effect of treatment in longitudinal study. Motor output was constant in both SRT and CRT tasks. In the SRT task, all stimuli required a response; in the CRT task, subjects were required to respond to only one of the two possible stimuli. Attentional focussing on SRT was examined by variation of the interval between cue and stimulus; effects of stimulus uncertainty were evaluated from a comparison of SRT and CRT; temporal predictability of the stimulus was examined from a comparison of conditions in which the interval between warning signal and imperative stimulus was constant or variable. The PD patients showed similar deficits in SRT and CRT, but normal effects of cue-stimulus interval and temporal predictability. Reaction time correlated with measures of global cognitive capacity and frontal-lobe function, as well as motor disability. Treatment had no effect on SRT or CRT, despite clinical benefit. These findings indicate that RT deficits in PD are not due to impaired attentional focussing or stimulus predictability but are compatible with a deficit in higher-order processes concerned with the orientation of both cognitive and motor responses to a stimulus. These processes are not substantially dopamine-dependent but may be served by non-dopaminergic neurotransmission.
帕金森病(PD)反应时间的研究表明,与选择反应时间(CRT)相比,简单反应时间(SRT)存在选择性缺陷。这一发现被解释为运动预编程的缺陷,但可能涉及其他因素,如注意力集中和刺激可预测性。此外,并非所有研究都显示出相同的选择性缺陷,这可能是由于患者选择和治疗效果的差异所致。PD中反应时间缺陷的神经化学基础仍不清楚。因此,在一大组PD患者中评估了认知因素对反应时间受损的影响,包括早期未治疗的病例,并在纵向研究中考察了其表现与临床变量及治疗效果的关系。在SRT和CRT任务中运动输出是恒定的。在SRT任务中,所有刺激都需要做出反应;在CRT任务中,受试者只需对两种可能刺激中的一种做出反应。通过改变提示与刺激之间的间隔来检查对SRT的注意力集中;通过比较SRT和CRT来评估刺激不确定性的影响;通过比较警告信号与指令性刺激之间的间隔恒定或变化的条件来检查刺激的时间可预测性。PD患者在SRT和CRT中表现出类似的缺陷,但提示-刺激间隔和时间可预测性的影响正常。反应时间与整体认知能力、额叶功能以及运动残疾的测量指标相关。尽管有临床益处,但治疗对SRT或CRT没有影响。这些发现表明,PD中的反应时间缺陷并非由于注意力集中受损或刺激可预测性受损,而是与涉及对刺激的认知和运动反应定向的高阶过程缺陷相符。这些过程基本上不依赖多巴胺,但可能由非多巴胺能神经传递提供支持。