Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Segall-Corrêa Ana Maria, Kurdian Maranha Lucia, Sampaio Md Maria de Fátima Archanjo, Marín-León Leticia, Panigassi Giseli
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4017, USA.
J Nutr. 2004 Aug;134(8):1923-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.8.1923.
Until recently, Brazil did not have a national instrument with which to assess household food insecurity (FI). The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to describe the process of adaptation and validation of the 15-item USDA FI module, and 2) to assess its validity in the city of Campinas. The USDA scale was translated into Portuguese and subsequently tested for content and face validity through content expert and focus groups made up of community members. This was followed by a quantitative validation based on a convenience (n = 125) and a representative (n = 847) sample. Key adaptations involved replacing the term "balanced meal" with "healthy and varied diet," to construct items as questions rather than statements, and to ensure that respondents understood that information would not be used to determine program eligibility. Chronbach's alpha was 0.91 and the scale item response curves were parallel across the 4 household income strata. FI severity level was strongly associated in a dose-response manner (P < 0.001) with income strata and the probability of daily intake of fruits, vegetables, meat/fish, and dairy. These findings were replicated in the 2 independent survey samples. Results indicate that the adapted version of the USDA food insecurity module is valid for the population of Campinas. This validation methodology has now been replicated in urban and/or rural areas of 4 additional states with similar results. Thus, Brazil now has a household food insecurity instrument that can be used to set national goals, to follow progress, and to evaluate its national hunger and poverty eradication programs.
直到最近,巴西还没有用于评估家庭粮食不安全状况(FI)的国家工具。本研究的目的如下:1)描述美国农业部15项粮食不安全模块的改编和验证过程;2)评估其在坎皮纳斯市的有效性。美国农业部的量表被翻译成葡萄牙语,随后通过内容专家和由社区成员组成的焦点小组对其内容效度和表面效度进行测试。接下来,基于一个便利样本(n = 125)和一个代表性样本(n = 847)进行了定量验证。关键的改编包括将“均衡膳食”一词替换为“健康多样的饮食”,将项目构建为问题而非陈述,并确保受访者明白信息不会用于确定项目资格。克朗巴赫α系数为0.91,量表项目反应曲线在4个家庭收入阶层中是平行的。粮食不安全严重程度水平与收入阶层以及每日摄入水果、蔬菜、肉类/鱼类和奶制品的概率呈剂量反应关系(P < 0.001)。这些结果在2个独立的调查样本中得到了重复。结果表明,改编后的美国农业部粮食不安全模块对坎皮纳斯市的人口是有效的。这种验证方法现已在另外4个州的城市和/或农村地区得到重复,结果相似。因此,巴西现在有了一种家庭粮食不安全工具,可用于设定国家目标、跟踪进展情况以及评估其国家消除饥饿和贫困计划。