Frasier Pamela York, Belton Leigh, Hooten Elizabeth, Campbell Marci Kramish, DeVellis Brenda, Benedict Salli, Carrillo Carla, Gonzalez Pam, Kelsey Kristine, Meier Andrea
Department of Family Medicine, CB #7595, University ofNorth Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Aug;31(4 Suppl):69S-84S. doi: 10.1177/1090198104266035.
In the aftermath of Hurricane Floyd in 1999, a Community Advisory Committee requested assistance from its university partners (University of North Carolina) to address stress and increased risk for intimate partner violence (IPV). Collected from 12 study work sites, baseline data indicated that IPV rates were higher among blue-collar women in eastern North Carolina than national population-based rates suggest. IPV victims reported higher levels of perceived stress, psychological distress, somatic complaints, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms than did nonvictimized coworkers. As for the relationship of the flood to IPV, no significant increase in IPV incidence occurred after the flood. Regardless of their flood experience, however, IPV victims consistently reported greater stress, PTSD symptoms, and somatic and psychological problems. Moreover, IPV victims may be at higher risk for stress-mediated chronic illnesses and for using negative coping behaviors. This study uses an established trusting relationship between researchers and community members to explore community needs and inform intervention design.
1999年弗洛伊德飓风过后,一个社区咨询委员会请求其大学合作伙伴(北卡罗来纳大学)提供帮助,以应对压力和亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)风险的增加。从12个研究工作地点收集的基线数据表明,北卡罗来纳州东部蓝领女性中的IPV发生率高于全国基于人口的发生率。IPV受害者报告的感知压力、心理困扰、躯体不适和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状水平高于未受侵害的同事。至于洪水与IPV的关系,洪水过后IPV发生率没有显著增加。然而,无论她们的洪水经历如何,IPV受害者始终报告有更大的压力、PTSD症状以及躯体和心理问题。此外,IPV受害者可能面临更高的压力介导的慢性病风险以及使用消极应对行为的风险。本研究利用研究人员与社区成员之间已建立的信任关系来探索社区需求并为干预设计提供信息。