Ekman Björn
Lund University Centre for Health Economics (LUCHE), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):249-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh031.
Health policy makers are faced with competing alternatives, and for systems of health care financing. The choice of financing method should mobilize resources for health care and provide financial protection. This review systematically assesses the evidence of the extent to which community-based health insurance is a viable option for low-income countries in mobilizing resources and providing financial protection. The review contributes to the literature on health financing by extending and qualifying existing knowledge. Overall, the evidence base is limited in scope and questionable in quality. There is strong evidence that community-based health insurance provides some financial protection by reducing out-of-pocket spending. There is evidence of moderate strength that such schemes improve cost-recovery. There is weak or no evidence that schemes have an effect on the quality of care or the efficiency with which care is produced. In absolute terms, the effects are small and schemes serve only a limited section of the population. The main policy implication of the review is that these types of community financing arrangements are, at best, complementary to other more effective systems of health financing. To improve reliability and validity of the evidence base, analysts should agree on a more coherent set of outcome indicators and a more consistent assessment of these indicators. Policy makers need to be better informed as to both the costs and the benefits of implementing various financing options. The current evidence base on community-based health insurance is mute on this point.
卫生政策制定者面临着相互竞争的选择,对于医疗保健融资体系而言亦是如此。融资方式的选择应能为医疗保健筹集资源并提供财务保护。本综述系统地评估了基于社区的医疗保险在低收入国家筹集资源和提供财务保护方面作为一种可行选择的程度的证据。该综述通过扩展和限定现有知识,为卫生融资文献做出了贡献。总体而言,证据基础在范围上有限且质量存疑。有强有力的证据表明,基于社区的医疗保险通过减少自付费用提供了一定的财务保护。有中等强度的证据表明,此类计划提高了成本回收。几乎没有证据表明这些计划对医疗质量或医疗服务效率有影响。从绝对意义上讲,影响很小,而且这些计划仅覆盖了有限的一部分人口。该综述的主要政策含义是,这些类型的社区融资安排充其量只是对其他更有效的卫生融资体系的补充。为提高证据基础的可靠性和有效性,分析人员应就一套更连贯的结果指标以及对这些指标更一致的评估达成共识。政策制定者需要更好地了解实施各种融资选项的成本和收益。目前关于基于社区的医疗保险的证据基础在这一点上尚无定论。