Shealy Craig N, Cobb Harriet C, Crowley Susan L, Nelson Paul, Peterson Gary
Department of Graduate Psychology, MSC 7401, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;60(9):893-909. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20025.
Is it possible and advisable for the profession of psychology to articulate and endorse a common, generalist, and integrative framework for the education and training of its students? At the Consensus Conference on Combined and Integrated Doctoral Training in Psychology, held at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, VA (USA), May 2 to 4, 2003, participants from across the spectrum of education and training in professional psychology ultimately answered "yes." This article, the first in this special series on the Consensus Conference and Combined-Integrated (C-I) model of doctoral training in professional psychology, essentially provides an overview of the conference rationale, participants, goals, proceedings, and results. Because the other 12 articles in this series all reference the Consensus Conference and C-I model, this overview provides a good starting point for understanding what occurred at the conference, what it means to educate and train from a C-I perspective, and what the potential implications of such a model might be for the profession of psychology.
心理学专业是否有可能且适宜阐明并认可一个针对其学生教育与培训的通用、综合且一体化的框架?在2003年5月2日至4日于美国弗吉尼亚州哈里森堡的詹姆斯·麦迪逊大学举行的心理学联合与综合博士培训共识会议上,来自专业心理学教育与培训各个领域的参与者最终给出了肯定的答案。本文作为关于该共识会议及专业心理学博士培训联合-综合(C-I)模式的这个特别系列的第一篇文章,主要概述了会议的基本原理、参与者、目标、议程及成果。由于本系列中的其他12篇文章均提及了该共识会议及C-I模式,所以这一概览为理解会议上发生了什么、从C-I视角进行教育与培训意味着什么以及这样一个模式可能对心理学专业产生哪些潜在影响提供了一个良好的起点。