Pienaar C, Swan M C, De Jager W, Solomons M
Martin Singer Hand Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.
J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Oct;29(5):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.03.006.
A retrospective study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of end-to-side nerve transfer. Twenty patients with peripheral nerve lesions of varying aetiology underwent 23 end-to-side nerve transfers over a 15-month period. The mean patient age was 30 years and 18 were male. The mean delay in presentation was 2.4 months. All underwent end-to-side nerve repairs and were reviewed in outpatients at regular intervals. Ten patients were lost to follow-up before 12 months and were therefore excluded from the study. The remaining ten patients, who had undergone 13 end-to-side procedures, had a mean follow-up period of 16 months. None demonstrated objective evidence of motor recovery at the end of the study period. Four patients had modest recovery of deep protective sensation, and two patients suffered a subtle degree of "donor" nerve morbidity. We have abandoned this technique in our centre in preference for standard nerve grafting techniques.
进行了一项回顾性研究以确定端侧神经转移术的有效性。20例病因各异的周围神经损伤患者在15个月内接受了23次端侧神经转移术。患者平均年龄为30岁,其中18例为男性。平均就诊延迟时间为2.4个月。所有患者均接受了端侧神经修复,并定期在门诊接受复查。10例患者在12个月前失访,因此被排除在研究之外。其余10例接受了13次端侧手术的患者,平均随访期为16个月。在研究期末,无一例显示出运动恢复的客观证据。4例患者的深部保护性感觉有适度恢复,2例患者出现轻微程度的“供体”神经病变。我们中心已放弃这项技术,转而采用标准的神经移植技术。