Crook Juanita, Ludgate Charles, Malone Shawn, Lim Jan, Perry Gad, Eapen Libne, Bowen Julie, Robertson Susan, Lockwood Gina
Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.022.
To evaluate the effect of 3 months vs. 8 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before conventional dose radiotherapy (RT) on disease-free survival using prostate-specific antigen PSA and biopsies as end points for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Between February 1995 and June 2001, 378 men were randomized to either 3 or 8 months of flutamide and goserelin before conventional-dose RT (66 Gy) at four participating centers. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 50-84 years). The stage distribution was 17% T1c, 35% T2a, 34% T2b-T2c, 13% T3-T4. The Gleason score (GS) was < or =6 in 51%, 7 in 38%, and 8-10 in 11%. The median baseline PSA level was 9.7 ng/mL (range, 1.3-189 ng/mL). Of the 378 men, 26% were low risk (Stage T1c-T2a, GS < or =6, PSA <10 ng/mL), 43% were intermediate risk (Stage T2b or GS 7 or PSA 10-20 ng/mL), and 31% were high risk (Stage T3 or GS 8-10 or PSA >20 ng/mL). The two arms were balanced in terms of age, GS, T stage, risk group, and presenting PSA level. The median follow-up was 44 months (range, 10-84 months), and 361 patients were available for evaluation.
The 8-month arm achieved a lower PSA level before starting RT (0.37 vs. 0.74 ng/mL, p < or =0.001) and had a greater downsizing of the prostate (mean volume 26.6 cm(3) vs. 30.5 cm(3), p < or =0.001). However, the actuarial freedom from failure rate (biochemical by American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition, local or distant) for the 3-month vs. 8-month arms at 3 years was 66% vs. 68% and by 5 years was 61% vs. 62%, respectively (p = 0.36). No statistically significant difference was noted in the types of failure between the two arms (crude final status): biochemical, 22.2% vs. 22.3%; local, 10.2% vs. 6.5%; and distant, 3.4% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.61). Two-year post-RT biopsies were done in 57% (n = 205). Negative biopsies were obtained in 68% of the 3-month and 77% of the 8-month patients; 18% and 14% had indeterminate biopsies and 14% and 9% were positive for residual cancer (p = 0.34) in the two arms, respectively. The median PSA level for nonfailing patients was 0.50 ng/mL in both the 3-months and 8-month arms. A suggestion of improvement was found in the 8-month arm for disease-free survival at 5 years for high-risk patients (39% vs. 52%) but did not achieve statistical significance.
A longer period of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before standard-dose RT does not appear to confer a benefit in terms of disease-free survival or to alter failure patterns. Failure was delayed in the 8-month arm, but this advantage was lost by 5 years of follow-up. A suggestion of benefit was noted with a longer period of hormonal therapy for high-risk patients.
以前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和活检作为临床局限性前列腺癌的终点指标,评估在常规剂量放疗(RT)前进行3个月与8个月新辅助激素治疗对无病生存期的影响。
1995年2月至2001年6月期间,378名男性在四个参与中心被随机分为两组,分别在常规剂量放疗(66 Gy)前接受3个月或8个月的氟他胺和戈舍瑞林治疗。患者年龄中位数为72岁(范围50 - 84岁)。分期分布为:17%为T1c期,35%为T2a期,34%为T2b - T2c期,13%为T3 - T4期。Gleason评分(GS)≤6分的占51%,7分的占38%,8 - 10分的占11%。基线PSA水平中位数为9.7 ng/mL(范围1.3 - 189 ng/mL)。在这378名男性中,26%为低风险(T1c - T2a期,GS≤6分,PSA<10 ng/mL),43%为中风险(T2b期或GS为7分或PSA为10 - 20 ng/mL),31%为高风险(T3期或GS为8 - 10分或PSA>20 ng/mL)。两组在年龄、GS、T分期、风险组和初始PSA水平方面保持平衡。中位随访时间为44个月(范围10 - 84个月),361名患者可供评估。
8个月治疗组在开始放疗前PSA水平较低(0.37 vs. 0.74 ng/mL,p≤0.001),前列腺缩小更明显(平均体积26.6 cm³ vs. 30.5 cm³,p≤0.001)。然而,3个月治疗组与8个月治疗组3年时的精算无失败生存率(根据美国放射肿瘤学会定义的生化指标、局部或远处指标)分别为66%和68%,5年时分别为61%和62%(p = 0.36)。两组间失败类型无统计学显著差异(粗略最终状态):生化指标,分别为22.2% vs. 22.3%;局部指标,分别为10.2% vs. 6.5%;远处指标,分别为3.4% vs. 4.4%(p = 0.61)。57%(n = 205)的患者在放疗后两年进行了活检。3个月治疗组68%的患者和8个月治疗组77%的患者活检结果为阴性;两组分别有18%和14%的患者活检结果不确定,14%和9%的患者活检发现残留癌呈阳性(p = 0.34)。3个月和8个月治疗组中未出现失败的患者PSA水平中位数均为0.50 ng/mL。对于高风险患者,8个月治疗组在5年无病生存期方面有改善趋势(39% vs. 52%),但未达到统计学显著差异。
在标准剂量放疗前进行更长时间的新辅助激素治疗似乎在无病生存期方面并无益处,也未改变失败模式。8个月治疗组失败时间有所延迟,但在5年随访时这种优势消失。对于高风险患者,较长时间的激素治疗有一定益处。