Gelamo Emerson Luiz, Itri Rosangela, Alonso Antonio, da Silva Junaine Vasques, Tabak Marcel
Instituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Cx. Postal 780, CEP 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004 Sep 15;277(2):471-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.065.
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) techniques have been used to monitor the interaction of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with ionic surfactants such as anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), zwitterionic N-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonium-1-propane sulfonate (HPS), and cationic cethyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) at pH 7.0. The SAXS results have shown that in the presence of 5 mM SDS and HPS the radius of gyration (Rg) almost does not change as compared to the BSA free-surfactant solution; its value is ca. 30 Angstroms. In the presence of 5 mM CTAC the SAXS data indicate the presence of a particle with a Rg of at least 63 Angstroms, suggesting that in this case, a kind of protein aggregation takes place. In the presence of SDS and HPS surfactants at concentrations above 10 mM, a characteristic broad peak in the region of 0.12-0.18 Angstroms(-1) indicates the presence of micelle-like aggregates in solution. The SAXS curves are consistent with the "pearl necklace" model, where micelle-like aggregates are randomly distributed around the polypeptide chain. EPR results using 5-DSA and 16-DSA spin labels show that in the presence of BSA the EPR spectra are composed of two label populations, one contacting the protein and a second one due to label localization in the micelles. Evidence is also obtained for a competition of the surfactants with the spin labels for the high-affinity binding sites of the stearic acid spin labels as monitored by changes in the fractions of the two label populations as the surfactant concentration is increased. The effect of SDS seems to be stronger in the sense that increased SDS concentration leads to a complete transfer of spin labels from close protein contact sites to micelles, while for HPS, a significant immobilization of probe apparently remains even at higher surfactant concentrations. These two techniques are quite useful since SAXS monitors the overall properties of the scattering particle, while EPR gives information on the dynamics inside this particle and associated with label localization and motion.
小角X射线散射(SAXS)和电子顺磁共振(EPR)技术已被用于监测牛血清白蛋白(BSA)与离子型表面活性剂在pH 7.0时的相互作用,这些离子型表面活性剂包括阴离子型十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)、两性离子型N-十六烷基-N,N-二甲基-3-铵基-1-丙烷磺酸盐(HPS)和阳离子型十六烷基三甲基氯化铵(CTAC)。SAXS结果表明,在存在5 mM SDS和HPS的情况下,与不含表面活性剂的BSA溶液相比,回转半径(Rg)几乎没有变化;其值约为30埃。在存在5 mM CTAC的情况下,SAXS数据表明存在一种Rg至少为63埃的颗粒,这表明在这种情况下发生了某种蛋白质聚集。在SDS和HPS表面活性剂浓度高于10 mM时,在0.12 - 0.18埃⁻¹区域出现的特征性宽峰表明溶液中存在胶束状聚集体。SAXS曲线与“珍珠项链”模型一致,其中胶束状聚集体随机分布在多肽链周围。使用5-DSA和16-DSA自旋标记的EPR结果表明,在存在BSA的情况下,EPR光谱由两个标记群体组成,一个与蛋白质接触,另一个是由于标记定位在胶束中。随着表面活性剂浓度增加,通过监测两个标记群体的比例变化,还获得了表面活性剂与自旋标记竞争硬脂酸自旋标记高亲和力结合位点的证据。从某种意义上说,SDS的影响似乎更强,因为SDS浓度增加会导致自旋标记从紧密的蛋白质接触位点完全转移到胶束中,而对于HPS,即使在较高的表面活性剂浓度下,探针明显仍有显著的固定化。这两种技术非常有用,因为SAXS监测散射颗粒的整体性质,而EPR提供有关该颗粒内部动力学以及与标记定位和运动相关的信息。