Suppr超能文献

人工晶状体光学边缘设计与材料对纤维化囊膜混浊及撕囊收缩的影响

Effect of intraocular lens optic edge design and material on fibrotic capsule opacification and capsulorhexis contraction.

作者信息

Sacu Stefan, Menapace Rupert, Buehl Wolf, Rainer Georg, Findl Oliver

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1875-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.042.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of intraocular lens (IOL) optic edge design and optic material on fibrosis of the anterior and peripheral posterior capsules and on capsulorhexis contraction.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

METHODS

This randomized controlled patient- and examiner-masked study comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In Group 1 (n = 53), the Sensar OptiEdge AR40e hydrophobic acrylic IOL with a sharp posterior optic edge was compared with the AR40 acrylic IOL with a round edge. In Group 2 (n = 52), the ClariFlex OptiEdge silicone IOL with a sharp posterior optic edge was compared with the PhacoFlex SI-40 silicone IOL with a round edge All IOLs were manufactured by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Standardized digital slitlamp images of anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and fibrotic posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were taken 1 year postoperatively, and digital retroillumination images were taken at 1 week and 1 year. The intensity of fibrotic PCO was graded subjectively (score 0 to 4), ACO was graded objectively (score 0% to 100%), and the capsulorhexis area (mm(2)) was determined objectively.

RESULTS

One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 32% in eyes with the sharp-edged acrylic IOL and 29% in eyes with the round-edged acrylic IOL (P<.05). In the silicone group, the mean was 31% and 26%, respectively (P<.05). The mean fibrotic PCO score was lower in eyes with a sharp-edged acrylic IOL than in eyes with a round-edged acrylic IOL (0.26 and 0.93, respectively; P<.05) and in eyes with a sharp-edged silicone IOL than in eyes with a round-edged silicone IOL (0.24 and 0.82, respectively; P<.001). At 1 year, the mean capsulorhexis area was statistically significantly smaller in eyes with a sharp-edged silicone IOL than in eyes with a round-edged silicone IOL (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Acrylic and silicone IOLs with the sharp OptiEdge design led to significantly less fibrotic PCO but more ACO than round-edged acrylic and silicone IOLs. The sharp-edged silicone IOL caused significantly more capsulorhexis contraction than the round-edged silicone IOL and both acrylic IOLs.

摘要

目的

研究人工晶状体(IOL)光学边缘设计和光学材料对前囊膜及周边后囊膜纤维化以及对撕囊收缩的影响。

设置

奥地利维也纳医科大学眼科。

方法

本随机对照、患者及检查者双盲研究纳入了105例双侧年龄相关性白内障患者的210只眼。在第1组(n = 53)中,将具有尖锐后光学边缘的Sensar OptiEdge AR40e疏水丙烯酸酯IOL与具有圆形边缘的AR40丙烯酸酯IOL进行比较。在第2组(n = 52)中,将具有尖锐后光学边缘的ClariFlex OptiEdge硅凝胶IOL与具有圆形边缘的PhacoFlex SI - 40硅凝胶IOL进行比较。所有IOL均由Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.生产。术后1年拍摄前囊膜混浊(ACO)和纤维化后囊膜混浊(PCO)的标准化数字裂隙灯图像,并在术后1周和1年拍摄数字后照法图像。纤维化PCO的强度进行主观分级(0至4分),ACO进行客观分级(0%至100分),并客观测定撕囊面积(mm²)。

结果

术后1年,具有尖锐边缘丙烯酸酯IOL的眼中ACO平均评分为32%,具有圆形边缘丙烯酸酯IOL的眼中为29%(P <.05)。在硅凝胶组中,平均值分别为31%和26%(P <.05)。具有尖锐边缘丙烯酸酯IOL的眼中纤维化PCO平均评分低于具有圆形边缘丙烯酸酯IOL的眼(分别为0.26和0.93;P <.05),具有尖锐边缘硅凝胶IOL的眼中低于具有圆形边缘硅凝胶IOL的眼(分别为0.24和0.82;P <.001)。在1年时,具有尖锐边缘硅凝胶IOL的眼中撕囊面积在统计学上显著小于具有圆形边缘硅凝胶IOL的眼(P <.05)。

结论

具有尖锐OptiEdge设计的丙烯酸酯和硅凝胶IOL导致的纤维化PCO明显少于圆形边缘的丙烯酸酯和硅凝胶IOL,但ACO更多。尖锐边缘的硅凝胶IOL导致的撕囊收缩明显多于圆形边缘的硅凝胶IOL以及两种丙烯酸酯IOL。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验