Shih Weichung J, Quan Hui, Li Gang
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick 08903, USA.
Stat Med. 2004 Sep 30;23(18):2781-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.1877.
In active controlled trials without a placebo arm, there are usually two study objectives: to test a superiority hypothesis that the experimental treatment is more effective than the active control therapy, and to test a non-inferiority hypothesis that the experimental treatment is therapeutically no worse than the active control within a defined margin. For a two-stage adaptive design, it is not necessary to give a fixed sample size calculation at the planning stage of the study when treatment effect information is often insufficient. Instead, decision and estimation of the design specifications can be made more reliably after the first stage when interim results are available. We propose the use of conditional power approach to determine the sample size and critical values for testing the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses for the second stage based on the observed result of the first stage. The proposed adaptive procedure preserves the overall type I error rate for both superiority and non-inferiority, and has the flexibility of early termination of the study (for futility or efficacy) or extending the study by appropriate sample size.
在没有安慰剂组的活性对照试验中,通常有两个研究目标:检验优效性假设,即试验性治疗比活性对照疗法更有效;检验非劣效性假设,即试验性治疗在规定的界值范围内治疗效果不比活性对照差。对于两阶段适应性设计,在研究的计划阶段,由于治疗效果信息通常不足,无需给出固定的样本量计算。相反,在第一阶段得到中期结果后,可以更可靠地进行设计规范的决策和估计。我们建议使用条件把握度方法,根据第一阶段的观察结果确定第二阶段检验优效性和非劣效性假设的样本量和临界值。所提出的适应性程序保持了优效性和非劣效性的总体I类错误率,并具有提前终止研究(因无效或有效)或通过适当样本量扩展研究的灵活性。