Walsh Neil P, Laing Stewart J, Oliver Samuel J, Montague Joanna C, Walters Robert, Bilzon James L J
School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1535-42. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000139797.26760.06.
Firstly, to identify whether saliva flow rate, osmolality, and total protein are potential markers of hydration, we compared changes in these parameters with changes in plasma osmolality during progressive dehydration. Secondly, we compared the sensitivity of saliva parameters to track hydration changes with the sensitivity of urine osmolality. Thirdly, to test the hypothesis that dehydration, rather than neuroendocrine regulation, is responsible for the decrease in saliva flow rate during prolonged exercise, we compared flow rate and catecholamine responses to prolonged exercise with and without fluids.
colon; Fifteen males (plasma osmolality 289 +/- 4 mOsmol x kg(-1); mean +/- SD) exercised (30 degrees C, 70% RH) with no fluid intake (NFI) until body mass loss (BML) of 1.1, 2.1, and 3.0% and on another occasion with fluid intake (FI) to offset losses.
colon; Plasma and urine osmolality increased during NFI (plasma osmolality 3.0% BML: 298 +/- 4 mOsmol x kg(-1); P < 0.01). Saliva flow rate decreased (P < 0.01), saliva total protein increased (P < 0.01), and saliva osmolality increased from preexercise (50 +/- 11 mOsmol x kg(-1)) to 3.0% BML (105 +/- 41 mOsmol x kg(-1)) during NFI (P < 0.01). Saliva osmolality, urine osmolality, and saliva total protein correlated strongly with plasma osmolality during dehydration (r 0.87, 0.83, and 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01). During the FI trial, saliva flow rate and osmolality remained unchanged. Plasma catecholamine concentration increased during exercise (P < 0.01) with no difference between trials.
colon; Saliva osmolality and total protein appear to be as sensitive as urine osmolality to track hydration changes during hypertonic-hypovolemia. These results also suggest that dehydration has a greater involvement in the decrease in saliva flow rate during prolonged exercise than neuroendocrine regulation.
首先,为了确定唾液流速、渗透压和总蛋白是否为水合作用的潜在标志物,我们在渐进性脱水过程中比较了这些参数的变化与血浆渗透压的变化。其次,我们比较了唾液参数追踪水合作用变化的敏感性与尿渗透压的敏感性。第三,为了验证长时间运动期间唾液流速下降是由脱水而非神经内分泌调节所致这一假设,我们比较了有无液体补充情况下长时间运动的流速和儿茶酚胺反应。
15名男性(血浆渗透压289±4 mOsmol·kg⁻¹;平均值±标准差)在(30℃,70%相对湿度)环境下运动,不摄入液体(NFI)直至体重减轻(BML)1.1%、2.1%和3.0%,另一次运动时摄入液体(FI)以抵消体重损失。
不摄入液体期间血浆和尿渗透压升高(体重减轻3.0%时血浆渗透压:298±4 mOsmol·kg⁻¹;P<0.01)。不摄入液体期间,唾液流速下降(P<0.01),唾液总蛋白增加(P<0.01),唾液渗透压从运动前(50±11 mOsmol·kg⁻¹)升高至体重减轻3.0%时(105±41 mOsmol·kg⁻¹)(P<0.01)。脱水期间唾液渗透压、尿渗透压和唾液总蛋白与血浆渗透压密切相关(r分别为0.87、0.83和0.91;P<0.01)。在摄入液体试验期间,唾液流速和渗透压保持不变。运动期间血浆儿茶酚胺浓度升高(P<0.01),各试验间无差异。
在高渗性低血容量期间,唾液渗透压和总蛋白在追踪水合作用变化方面似乎与尿渗透压一样敏感。这些结果还表明,长时间运动期间脱水对唾液流速下降的影响大于神经内分泌调节。