Tochigi Yuki, Amendola Annunziato, Rudert M James, Baer Thomas E, Brown Thomas D, Hillis Stephen L, Saltzman Charles L
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Aug;25(8):588-96. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500813.
Injury of the interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) has been recognized as a cause of subtalar instability, though lack of an accepted clinical test has limited the ability of clinicians to reliably make the diagnosis. Clinical effects of ITCL failure remain unclear because of insufficient understanding of the role of the ligament.
Load-displacement characteristics of the subtalar joint were studied in six cadaver specimens using an axial distraction test and a transverse multi-direction drawer test. In all tests, cyclic loading (+/-60 N) was applied, and load-displacement responses were collected before and after sectioning of the ITCL. Two parameters were used to analyze the data: neutral-zone laxity as a measure of joint play, and flexibility as a measure of resistance to applied force.
In the axial distraction test, sectioning increased both neutral-zone laxity and flexibility (p =.01 and.02, respectively). In the transverse test, sectioning caused increase of both neutral-zone laxity and flexibility (p <.001, for each). Neutral-zone laxity increased most greatly along an axis defined roughly by the posterior aspect of the fibula and the central region of the medial malleolus. Flexibility increased most in the medial direction (p <.05, for each).
Results confirmed the role of the ITCL in maintaining apposition of the subtalar joint, as well as suggested its role in stabilizing the subtalar joint against drawer forces applied to the calcaneus from lateral to medial. The dominant direction of increased neutral-zone laxity described above suggests the optimal direction for detecting subtalar instability involved with ITCL injury.
ITCL failure may result in subtalar instability and should be examined with a drawer force along the preferential axis roughly from the posterior aspect of the fibula to the central region of the medial malleolus. Further clinical evaluation is required to determine whether ITCL failure is reliably detectable.
尽管缺乏公认的临床检查方法限制了临床医生可靠诊断的能力,但距跟骨间韧带(ITCL)损伤已被确认为距下关节不稳定的一个原因。由于对该韧带作用的认识不足,ITCL损伤后产生的临床影响仍不明确。
采用轴向牵拉试验和横向多方向抽屉试验,对6具尸体标本的距下关节进行载荷-位移特性研究。在所有试验中,施加循环载荷(±60N),并在切断ITCL前后收集载荷-位移响应。使用两个参数分析数据:中性区松弛度作为关节活动度的指标,柔韧性作为对抗外力的指标。
在轴向牵拉试验中,切断ITCL后中性区松弛度和柔韧性均增加(分别为p = 0.01和0.02)。在横向试验中,切断ITCL后中性区松弛度和柔韧性均增加(每项p < 0.001)。中性区松弛度沿大致由腓骨后侧和内踝中心区域确定的轴线增加最为显著。柔韧性在内侧方向增加最为明显(每项p < 0.05)。
结果证实了ITCL在维持距下关节对合中的作用,并提示其在稳定距下关节以抵抗从外侧到内侧施加于跟骨的抽屉力方面的作用。上述中性区松弛度增加的主导方向提示了检测与ITCL损伤相关的距下关节不稳定的最佳方向。
ITCL损伤可能导致距下关节不稳定,应沿大致从腓骨后侧到内踝中心区域的优先轴线施加抽屉力进行检查。需要进一步的临床评估以确定ITCL损伤是否能被可靠检测。