Mitchell Helen F, Kenny Dianna T
Australian Centre for Applied Research in Music Performance, Sydney Conservatorium of Music, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004;29(3):99-118. doi: 10.1080/14015430410015722.
In the third of a series of studies on open throat technique, we compared long term average spectra (LTAS) of six advanced singing students under three conditions: 'optimal' (O), representing maximal open throat, 'sub-optimal' (SO), using reduced open throat, and loud sub-optimal (LSO) to control for the effect of loudness. Using a series of univariate repeated measures ANOVAs with planned orthogonal contrasts, we tested the hypotheses that sound pressure level (SPL) and the ratio of spectral energy in peaks and areas between 0-2 kHz and 2-4 kHz would be reduced in SO and LSO compared to O. There were significant differences between SO and LSO but hypotheses were not confirmed for O. These findings do not accord with differences in vibrato extent and onset between O and SO/LSO (Mitchell and Kenny, in press). These results suggest that while LTAS provides information on energy distribution, measuring spectral energy areas appears to be the most sensitive measure of energy distribution between conditions. Plotting the differences between O and SO/LSO pairs of LTAS clearly indicates the areas of spectral change. The findings from this study also indicate that LTAS are not sufficiently sensitive to measure vocal timbre as they were not consistent with perceptual or other acoustic studies of the same samples.
在关于开放喉咙技术的系列研究的第三项中,我们比较了六名高级声乐学生在三种条件下的长期平均频谱(LTAS):“最佳”(O),代表最大程度的开放喉咙;“次优”(SO),使用减少的开放喉咙;以及大声次优(LSO),以控制响度的影响。通过一系列带有计划正交对比的单变量重复测量方差分析,我们检验了以下假设:与O相比,SO和LSO中的声压级(SPL)以及0 - 2 kHz和2 - 4 kHz之间峰值和区域的频谱能量比会降低。SO和LSO之间存在显著差异,但关于O的假设未得到证实。这些发现与O和SO/LSO之间颤音程度和起始的差异不一致(Mitchell和Kenny,即将出版)。这些结果表明,虽然LTAS提供了关于能量分布的信息,但测量频谱能量区域似乎是不同条件之间能量分布最敏感的测量方法。绘制O和SO/LSO的LTAS对之间的差异清楚地表明了频谱变化的区域。这项研究的结果还表明,LTAS对测量声乐音色不够敏感,因为它们与对相同样本的感知或其他声学研究不一致。