Cieza Alarcos, Stucki Gerold, Weigl Martin, Disler Peter, Jäckel Wilfried, van der Linden Sjef, Kostanjsek Nenad, de Bie Rob
ICF Research Branch, WHO FIC Collaborating Center (DIMDI), IMBK, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Jul(44 Suppl):69-74. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016037.
To report on the results of the consensus process integrating evidence from preliminary studies to develop the first version of a Comprehensive ICF Core Set and a Brief ICF Core Set for low back pain.
A formal decision-making and consensus process integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies was followed. Preliminary studies included a Delphi exercise, a systematic review and an empirical data collection. After training in the ICF and based on these preliminary studies, relevant ICF categories were identified in a formal consensus process by international experts from different backgrounds.
The preliminary studies identified a set of 503 ICF categories at the second, third and fourth ICF levels with 211 categories on body functions, 47 on body structures, 190 on activities and participation and 55 on environmental factors. Eighteen experts from 15 different countries attended the consensus conference on low back pain. Altogether 78 second-level categories were included in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set with 19 categories from the component body functions, 5 from body structures, 29 from activities and participation and 25 from environmental factors. The Brief ICF Core Set included a total of 35 second-level categories with 10 on body functions, 3 on body structures, 12 on activities and participation and 10 on environmental factors.
A formal consensus process integrating evidence and expert opinion based on the ICF framework and classification led to the definition of ICF Core Sets for low back pain. Both the Comprehensive ICF Core Set and the Brief ICF Core Set were defined.
报告整合初步研究证据以制定首个腰痛综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心组合及简短ICF核心组合的共识过程结果。
遵循整合从初步研究收集的证据的正式决策和共识过程。初步研究包括德尔菲法、系统评价和实证数据收集。在接受ICF培训后,基于这些初步研究,来自不同背景的国际专家在正式共识过程中确定了相关的ICF类目。
初步研究在ICF的第二、第三和第四级别确定了一组503个ICF类目,其中身体功能类目211个、身体结构类目47个、活动与参与类目190个、环境因素类目55个。来自15个不同国家的18名专家参加了腰痛共识会议。综合ICF核心组合共纳入78个第二级别类目,其中身体功能部分19个、身体结构部分5个、活动与参与部分29个、环境因素部分25个。简短ICF核心组合共包括35个第二级别类目,其中身体功能类目10个、身体结构类目3个、活动与参与类目12个、环境因素类目10个。
基于ICF框架和分类整合证据与专家意见的正式共识过程,得出了腰痛的ICF核心组合定义。综合ICF核心组合和简短ICF核心组合均已确定。