Christensen Morten Bondo, Christensen Bo, Mortensen Jens Tølbøll, Olesen Frede
Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Sep;22(3):180-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430410006576.
To investigate whether the number of frequent attenders (FA) contacts with the out-of-hours service can be reduced by deploying a combination of intervention strategies.
A stratified cluster randomized controlled trial, each cluster containing a general practice and all its listed patients.
The out-of-hours service in the county of Northern Jutland (490,000 inhabitants), Denmark.
The following intervention strategies were deployed: predisposition, individual instruction, economic incitement, continuing medical education meetings, feedback/reminder, and patient-mediated intervention.
An intervention group of 3500 patients and a control group of 4635 patients.
Absolute and relative fall in the number of contacts with the out-of-hours service per patient after 6 and 12 months.
Analysed by group, intervention patients saw a more pronounced decline in the number of contacts than controls, except for two outcomes. However, this difference was only significant after 12 months. For women aged 17-66 years with 5-9 contacts during the previous 12 months, the decrease was significantly more pronounced in the intervention group for all outcomes (p=0.004-0.042). However, for the rest of the subgroups the effect varied more, and in several cases it was more distinct in the control group.
The data collected point towards an effect of intervention on the use of out-of-hours services even if the responses obtained were not uniform and unequivocal. However, one has to consider the problems of multiple comparisons and in conclusion no convincing effect of the intervention was found.
探讨通过部署一系列干预策略的组合,能否减少频繁就诊者(FA)与非工作时间服务机构的接触次数。
一项分层整群随机对照试验,每个整群包含一家全科诊所及其所有在册患者。
丹麦北日德兰郡(49万居民)的非工作时间服务机构。
部署了以下干预策略:易感性干预、个体指导、经济激励、继续医学教育会议、反馈/提醒以及患者介导干预。
一个由3500名患者组成的干预组和一个由4635名患者组成的对照组。
6个月和12个月后,每位患者与非工作时间服务机构接触次数的绝对下降量和相对下降量。
按组分析,除两项结果外,干预组患者的接触次数下降比对照组更为明显。然而,这种差异仅在12个月后具有统计学意义。对于在过去12个月内有5 - 9次接触的17 - 66岁女性,干预组在所有结果方面的下降均明显更为显著(p = 0.004 - 0.042)。然而,对于其他亚组,效果差异更大,在某些情况下,对照组的效果更为明显。
收集到的数据表明干预措施对非工作时间服务的使用有影响,尽管得到的反应并不一致且明确。然而,必须考虑多重比较的问题,总体而言,未发现干预措施有令人信服的效果。