Suppr超能文献

会阴评估工具的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool.

作者信息

Nix Denise Henry

机构信息

WebWOC Nursing Education Program, Metropolitan State University School of Nursing, St. Paul, Minn, USA.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Feb;48(2):43-6, 48-9.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of an instrument designed to measure risk of perineal skin injury in hospitalized individuals. Interrater reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool was examined by correlating the scores calculated by a wound, ostomy and continence nurse compared to those calculated by staff RNs and LPNs using the same tool with the same patient. Content validity was assessed by obtaining level of agreement ratings from 102 wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. Good correlation between the expert and staff nurse scores was found (r = .970, confidence intervals = 95%, P = .923 to .988 or P < .0001). Average perineal assessment tool subscale level of agreement scores ranged from 7.66 to 8.4 (range 1 = strongly disagree to 10 = strongly agree) and the median score for all subscales was 9. The results obtained are encouraging and justify additional reliability and validity studies.

摘要

本研究旨在评估一种用于测量住院患者会阴皮肤损伤风险的工具的有效性和可靠性。通过比较伤口造口及失禁护理护士与注册护士和执业护士使用同一工具对同一患者计算得出的分数,来检验会阴评估工具的评分者间信度。通过获取102名伤口造口及失禁护理护士的一致性评级水平来评估内容效度。发现专家护士和普通护士的评分之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.970,置信区间 = 95%,P = 0.923至0.988或P < 0.0001)。会阴评估工具子量表的平均一致性评分范围为7.66至8.4(范围1 = 强烈不同意至10 = 强烈同意),所有子量表的中位数评分为9。所得结果令人鼓舞,有理由进行更多的信度和效度研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验