Kendall Wanda D Beyer, Cheung Monit
P.O. Box 4161, Beaumont, TX, 77704, USA.
J Child Sex Abus. 2004;13(2):41-57. doi: 10.1300/J070v13n02_03.
This article analyzes the civil commitment models for treating sexually violent predators (SVPs) and analyzes recent civil commitment laws. SVPs are commonly defined as sex offenders who are particularly predatory and repetitive in their sexually violent behavior. Data from policy literature, a survey to all states, and a review of law review Websites identify 16 states that have civil commitment statutes to address the problem and treatment of SVPs, four states that are in the process of passing such laws, six states that failed to enact proposed statutes, six states that lack SVP legislation, and 18 states that do not have relevant data available. The majority of such laws have created a false sense of safety because they address only convicted sex offenders. New approaches to the civil commitment of sexually violent predators have created multifaceted demands, controversy, ethical dilemmas, and learning opportunities. It is advised that research should be focused on the parameters of sexually violent behaviors, program flexibility, and treatment effectiveness.
本文分析了用于治疗性暴力掠夺者(SVPs)的民事拘押模式,并分析了近期的民事拘押法律。性暴力掠夺者通常被定义为在性暴力行为中具有特别掠夺性和重复性的性犯罪者。来自政策文献的数据、对所有州的一项调查以及对法律评论网站的审查表明,有16个州制定了民事拘押法规以应对性暴力掠夺者的问题和治疗,4个州正在通过此类法律的过程中,6个州未能颁布提议的法规,6个州缺乏性暴力掠夺者立法,还有18个州没有可用的相关数据。大多数此类法律营造了一种虚假的安全感,但它们仅针对已定罪的性犯罪者。性暴力掠夺者民事拘押的新方法引发了多方面的需求、争议、伦理困境和学习机会。建议研究应聚焦于性暴力行为的参数、项目灵活性和治疗效果。