Heiss Wolf-Dieter, Sobesky Jan, Hesselmann Volker
Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, University of Cologne, Germany.
Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11 Suppl 1):2671-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143329.81997.8a. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in combination with perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) has become a widely accepted modality for the selection of patients amenable for acute therapy, if a mismatch between these procedures suggests viable penumbral tissue. However, DWI as well as PWI yields semiquantitative measures limiting the definitions of irreversible damage and of potentially viable penumbral tissue. These limitations of PWI/DWI may be better understood if findings in individual patients are compared with the results from measurements of blood flow, oxygen metabolism, and benzodiazepine receptor binding obtained with positron emission tomography (PET). Comparative studies with PET and MRI were performed in 3 groups of patients: (1) In 12 acute stroke patients, results from DWI (median, 6.5 hours after symptom onset) and 11C-flumazenil (FMZ) PET (median, 85 minutes between DWI and PET) were compared with infarct extension 24 to 48 hours later on T2-weighted MRI. (2) In 11 acute stroke patients, results from PWI (median, 8 hours after symptom onset) were compared with cerebral blood flow measurements obtained with [15O]H2O PET (interval, 60 minutes between PWI and PET). (3) In 10 patients with acute (n=5) or chronic stroke (n=5), results from PWI/DWI were compared with PET of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption to detect mismatch or increased oxygen extraction fraction as surrogate markers of penumbra. Results were: (1) from regions with increased DWI intensity, decreased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and decreased FMZ binding probability curves were computed for eventual infarction, and 95% prediction limits were determined. These limits predicted 83.5% (FMZ), 84.7% (DWI), and 70.9% (ADC) of the final infarct volume. However, the false-positive predictions were much higher for the DWI variables (5.1 and 3.6 cm3 for DWI and ADC versus a median of 0 for FMZ). (2) The comparison of volumes generated by different time to peak (TTP) thresholds (PWI) and hypoperfusion <20 mL/100 g per minute (PET) indicates that a TTP delay of 4 to 6 seconds yields a fair estimate of hypoperfusion. (3) The PWI/DWI mismatch with TTP >4 seconds did not reliably correspond to the penumbra as assessed by PET (oxygen extraction fraction >150%). Only 6 of 10 patients with a mismatch had areas of penumbra. In these cases, the penumbra volume was overestimated by MRI. DWI correlates with FMZ results and, with a few exceptions, yields a good estimate of acute tissue damage and final infarct volume. PWI measures seem to be less reliable; the TTP prolongation of >4 seconds assessed only 83% of the volume of hypoperfusion <20 mL/100 g per minute. The mismatch volume imprecisely depicts increased oxygen extraction fraction, and, despite its clinical role for selection of patients for eventual therapy, it does not to seem to be a reliable correlate of penumbra.
弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)与灌注加权磁共振成像(PWI)相结合,已成为一种广泛接受的用于选择适合急性治疗患者的检查方法。如果这两种检查结果不匹配,则提示存在存活的半暗带组织。然而,DWI和PWI均产生半定量测量结果,限制了对不可逆损伤和潜在存活半暗带组织的定义。如果将个体患者的检查结果与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量的血流、氧代谢和苯二氮䓬受体结合结果进行比较,可能会更好地理解PWI/DWI的这些局限性。对3组患者进行了PET与MRI的对比研究:(1)在12例急性卒中患者中,将DWI(症状发作后中位数为6.5小时)和11C-氟马西尼(FMZ)PET(DWI与PET之间的中位数为85分钟)的结果与24至48小时后T2加权MRI上的梗死灶扩展情况进行比较。(2)在11例急性卒中患者中,将PWI(症状发作后中位数为8小时)的结果与用[15O]H2O PET获得的脑血流量测量结果进行比较(PWI与PET之间的间隔为60分钟)。(3)在10例急性(n = 5)或慢性卒中(n = 5)患者中,将PWI/DWI的结果与脑血流量和氧消耗的PET结果进行比较,以检测不匹配或氧摄取分数增加作为半暗带的替代标志物。结果如下:(1)从DWI强度增加的区域,计算出表观扩散系数(ADC)降低和FMZ结合概率曲线降低以预测最终梗死灶,并确定95%的预测界限。这些界限预测了最终梗死灶体积的83.5%(FMZ)、84.7%(DWI)和70.9%(ADC)。然而,DWI变量的假阳性预测要高得多(DWI和ADC分别为5.1和3.6 cm3,而FMZ中位数为0)。(2)不同达峰时间(TTP)阈值(PWI)和灌注不足<20 mL/100 g每分钟(PET)所产生体积的比较表明,TTP延迟4至6秒可对灌注不足做出合理估计。(3)TTP>4秒的PWI/DWI不匹配并不能可靠地对应于PET评估的半暗带(氧摄取分数>150%)。10例不匹配患者中只有6例有半暗带区域。在这些病例中,MRI高估了半暗带体积。DWI与FMZ结果相关,并且除了少数例外,能较好地估计急性组织损伤和最终梗死灶体积。PWI测量似乎不太可靠;TTP延长>4秒仅评估了灌注不足<20 mL/100 g每分钟体积的83%。不匹配体积不能准确描绘氧摄取分数增加的情况,并且尽管其在选择最终治疗患者方面具有临床作用,但似乎并不是半暗带的可靠指标。