Suresh Gautham K, Clark Robin E
Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina Children's Hospital, Room 664, Neonatal Division, 165 Ashley Ave, PO Box 250917, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):917-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0899.
There is concern about an increasing incidence of kernicterus in healthy term neonates in the United States. Although the incidence of kernicterus is unknown, several potential strategies that are intended to prevent kernicterus have been proposed by experts. It is necessary to assess the costs, benefits, and risks of such strategies before widespread policy changes are made. The objective of this study was to determine the direct costs to prevent a case of kernicterus with the following 3 strategies: (1) universal follow-up in the office or at home within 1 to 2 days of early newborn discharge, (2) routine predischarge serum bilirubin with selective follow-up and laboratory testing, and (3) routine predischarge transcutaneous bilirubin with selective follow-up and laboratory testing.
We performed an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the 3 strategies compared with current practice. We used a decision analytic model and a spreadsheet to estimate the direct costs and outcomes, including the savings resulting from prevented kernicterus, for an annual cohort of 2,800000 healthy term newborns who are eligible for early discharge. We used a modified societal perspective and 2002 US dollars. With each strategy, the test and treatment thresholds for hyperbilirubinemia are lowered compared with current practice.
With the base-case assumptions (current incidence of kernicterus 1:100 000 and a relative risk reduction [RRR] of 0.7 with each strategy), the cost to prevent 1 case of kernicterus was 10,321463 dollars, 5,743905 dollars, and 9,191352 dollars respectively for strategies 1, 2, and 3 listed above. The total annual incremental costs for the cohort were, respectively, 202,300671 dollars, 112,580535 dollars, and 180,150494 dollars. Sensitivity analyses showed that the cost per case is highly dependent on the population incidence of kernicterus and the RRR with each strategy, both of which are currently unknown. In our model, annual cost savings of 46,179465 dollars for the cohort would result with strategy 2, if the incidence of kernicterus is high (1:10,000 births or higher) and the RRR is high (> or =0.7). If the incidence is lower or the RRR is lower, then the cost per case prevented ranged from 4,145676 dollars to as high as 77,650240 dollars.
Widespread implementation of these strategies is likely to increase health care costs significantly with uncertain benefits. It is premature to implement routine predischarge serum or transcutaneous bilirubin screening on a large scale. However, universal follow-up may have benefits beyond kernicterus prevention, which we did not include in our model. Research is required to determine the epidemiology, risk factors, and causes of kernicterus; to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies intended to prevent kernicterus; and to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life year with any proposed preventive strategy.
美国健康足月儿核黄疸发病率呈上升趋势,这引发了人们的关注。尽管核黄疸的发病率尚不清楚,但专家们已提出了几种旨在预防核黄疸的潜在策略。在广泛改变政策之前,有必要评估这些策略的成本、效益和风险。本研究的目的是确定采用以下三种策略预防一例核黄疸的直接成本:(1)在新生儿早期出院后1至2天内进行普遍的门诊或家庭随访;(2)常规出院前血清胆红素检测并进行选择性随访和实验室检查;(3)常规出院前经皮胆红素检测并进行选择性随访和实验室检查。
我们对这三种策略与当前做法进行了增量成本效益分析。我们使用决策分析模型和电子表格来估计直接成本和结果,包括因预防核黄疸而节省的费用,对象为每年280万符合早期出院条件的健康足月儿队列。我们采用了修正的社会视角和2002年美元价值。与当前做法相比,每种策略都降低了高胆红素血症的检测和治疗阈值。
在基本假设条件下(当前核黄疸发病率为1:100000,每种策略的相对风险降低率[RRR]为0.7),上述策略(1)、(2)和(3)预防一例核黄疸的成本分别为10321463美元、5743905美元和9191352美元。该队列每年的总增量成本分别为202300671美元、112580535美元和180150494美元。敏感性分析表明,每例成本高度依赖于核黄疸的人群发病率和每种策略的RRR,而这两者目前均未知。在我们的模型中,如果核黄疸发病率较高(每10000例出生中有1例或更高)且RRR较高(≥0.7),则采用策略2时该队列每年可节省成本46179465美元。如果发病率较低或RRR较低,那么预防每例的成本范围从4145676美元到高达77650240美元。
广泛实施这些策略可能会显著增加医疗保健成本,而效益尚不确定。大规模实施常规出院前血清或经皮胆红素筛查为时过早。然而,普遍随访可能带来除预防核黄疸之外的益处,我们在模型中未纳入这些益处。需要开展研究以确定核黄疸的流行病学、危险因素和病因;评估旨在预防核黄疸的策略的有效性;并确定任何拟议预防策略的每质量调整生命年成本。