Suppr超能文献

家庭成员对死亡质量评估的一致性。

Agreement among family members in their assessment of the Quality of Dying and Death.

作者信息

Mularski Richard, Curtis J Randall, Osborne Molly, Engelberg Ruth A, Ganzini Linda

机构信息

Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, The University of California, 90073, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Oct;28(4):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.01.008.

Abstract

Improving end-of-life care requires accurate indicators of the quality of dying. The purpose of this study was to measure the agreement among family members who rate a loved one's dying experience. We administered the Quality of Dying and Death instrument to 94 family members of 38 patients who died in the intensive care unit. We measured a quality of dying score of 60 out of 100 points and found moderate agreement among family members as measured by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.44. Variability on individual items ranged from an ICC of 0.15 to 1.0. Families demonstrated more agreement on frequencies of events (ICC 0.54) than on determinations of quality (ICC 0.32). These findings reveal important variability among family raters and suggest that until the variability is understood, multiple raters may generate more comprehensive end-of-life data and may more accurately reflect the quality of dying and death.

摘要

改善临终关怀需要准确的死亡质量指标。本研究的目的是衡量对所爱之人临终体验进行评分的家庭成员之间的一致性。我们对38名在重症监护病房死亡患者的94名家庭成员进行了“死亡与临终质量”量表测试。我们测得死亡质量得分为满分100分中的60分,并通过组内相关系数(ICC)为0.44发现家庭成员之间存在中度一致性。各个项目的变异性范围为ICC 0.15至1.0。家庭成员在事件发生频率方面(ICC 0.54)比在质量判定方面(ICC 0.32)表现出更高的一致性。这些发现揭示了家庭评分者之间存在重要的变异性,并表明在理解这种变异性之前,多个评分者可能会生成更全面的临终数据,并且可能更准确地反映死亡与临终的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验