Altshuler Lori L, Ventura Joseph, van Gorp Wilfred G, Green Michael F, Theberge David C, Mintz Jim
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Oct 15;56(8):560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.002.
Patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have been shown to have neurocognitive deficits when compared with control subjects. The degree and pattern of impairment between psychiatric groups have rarely been compared, especially when subjects are psychiatrically stable.
Using a standard neurocognitive battery, we compared euthymic outpatients with bipolar disorder (n = 40), stable patients with schizophrenia (n = 20), and subjects with no psychiatric disorder (n = 22). The neurocognitive domains assessed included executive functioning, verbal memory, visual memory, procedural learning, visuoconstructive ability, and language functions. Effect sizes were calculated for each cognitive domain across groups.
Stable schizophrenic subjects demonstrated a generalized cognitive impairment across most domains compared with control subjects, with average effect sizes of .9. Euthymic bipolar subjects were significantly impaired compared with control subjects only in executive functioning (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task) and verbal memory (California Verbal Learning Test) domains (effect sizes in the .8-.9 range). Performance on the executive function measures was bimodal among bipolar subjects, suggesting two subgroups: one with relatively normal and one with impaired executive functioning. No significant differences between the bipolar patient group and control subjects were observed in visuoconstructive ability, procedural learning, or language function.
Both euthymic bipolar subjects and relatively stable schizophrenic subjects differed from control subjects in neurocognitive function. Among schizophrenic subjects, a generalized cognitive impairment was observed, and the degree of impairment was greater in the schizophrenic compared with the bipolar subjects. Subjects with bipolar disorder were impaired in two specific domains (verbal memory and executive function). Furthermore, within the bipolar group there was a subset with relatively normal executive functioning and a subset with significant impairment. Possible reasons for the persistence of these neurocognitive deficits in some subjects with bipolar disorder during periods of euthymia are reviewed.
与对照组相比,双相情感障碍和精神分裂症患者已被证明存在神经认知缺陷。很少有人比较过不同精神疾病组之间损伤的程度和模式,尤其是当受试者处于精神状态稳定时。
我们使用标准的神经认知测试组,比较了心境正常的双相情感障碍门诊患者(n = 40)、病情稳定的精神分裂症患者(n = 20)和无精神疾病的受试者(n = 22)。评估的神经认知领域包括执行功能、言语记忆、视觉记忆、程序学习、视觉构建能力和语言功能。计算了各组在每个认知领域的效应量。
与对照组相比,病情稳定的精神分裂症受试者在大多数领域表现出广泛性认知损伤,平均效应量为0.9。心境正常的双相情感障碍受试者仅在执行功能(威斯康星卡片分类测验)和言语记忆(加利福尼亚言语学习测验)领域与对照组相比有显著损伤(效应量在0.8 - 0.9范围内)。双相情感障碍受试者在执行功能测量中的表现呈双峰分布,提示有两个亚组:一个执行功能相对正常,另一个执行功能受损。在视觉构建能力、程序学习或语言功能方面,未观察到双相情感障碍患者组与对照组之间有显著差异。
心境正常的双相情感障碍受试者和病情相对稳定的精神分裂症受试者在神经认知功能方面均与对照组不同。在精神分裂症受试者中,观察到广泛性认知损伤,且精神分裂症患者的损伤程度比双相情感障碍患者更大。双相情感障碍患者在两个特定领域(言语记忆和执行功能)存在损伤。此外,在双相情感障碍组内,有一部分执行功能相对正常,另一部分有显著损伤。本文回顾了双相情感障碍患者在心境正常期某些患者神经认知缺陷持续存在的可能原因。