Acosta Edward P, Wu Hulin, Hammer Scott M, Yu Song, Kuritzkes Daniel R, Walawander Ann, Eron Joseph J, Fichtenbaum Carl J, Pettinelli Carla, Neath Denise, Ferguson Elaine, Saah Alfred J, Gerber John G
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Nov 1;37(3):1358-66. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200411010-00004.
Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) for salvage therapy is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/RTV at 800/200 mg (arm A) and 400/400 mg (arm B) administered twice daily in HIV-infected subjects failing their first PI-based regimen.
A phase I/II, randomized, open-label, 24-week study was conducted. Formal 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed, and study visits occurred at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and every 4 week thereafter for 24 weeks. Clinical symptoms and laboratory assessments were collected. Subjects were allowed to switch arms because of toxicity.
Forty-four subjects were enrolled (22 per arm). IDV predose concentration, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher in arm A. Fifty-five percent and 45% of subjects in arms A and B responded (<200 copies/mL at week 24; P = 0.76), respectively. CD4 cell responses were similar. All subjects had IDV-sensitive virus at baseline and at virologic failure. Tolerability was comparable, but all grade 3 or higher triglyceride increases occurred in arm B and more subjects in arm B switched because of toxicity (5 vs. 1 triglyceride increases).
This is the largest formal pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 dosage combinations of IDV/RTV in HIV-infected individuals. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous results in patients but lower than in seronegative controls. Both regimens exhibited similar tolerability and response rates. High toxicity with a low response suggests that the optimum IDV/RTV combination would include an RTV dose <400 mg and an IDV dose <800 mg in this population.
低剂量利托那韦(RTV)用于增强蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)的药代动力学以进行挽救治疗日益普遍。本研究的目的是比较在基于蛋白酶抑制剂的首个治疗方案失败的HIV感染受试者中,每日两次服用800/200毫克茚地那韦(IDV)/RTV(A组)和400/400毫克(B组)的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。
进行了一项I/II期、随机、开放标签、为期24周的研究。进行了正式的12小时药代动力学评估,研究访视在基线时进行;在第1、2和4周;此后每4周进行一次,共24周。收集临床症状和实验室评估结果。因毒性反应,受试者可更换分组。
共纳入44名受试者(每组22名)。A组的IDV给药前浓度、最大血浆浓度和曲线下面积显著更高。A组和B组分别有55%和45%的受试者有反应(第24周时<200拷贝/毫升;P = 0.76)。CD4细胞反应相似。所有受试者在基线和病毒学失败时均感染对IDV敏感的病毒。耐受性相当,但所有3级或更高的甘油三酯升高均发生在B组,且B组因毒性反应更换分组的受试者更多(甘油三酯升高分别为5例和1例)。
这是对HIV感染个体中IDV/RTV两种剂量组合进行的最大规模正式药代动力学评估。药代动力学参数与先前患者研究结果一致,但低于血清学阴性对照。两种治疗方案的耐受性和反应率相似。高毒性和低反应表明,在该人群中,最佳的IDV/RTV组合应包括RTV剂量<400毫克和IDV剂量<800毫克。