Le Drezen L, Lepiouf L, Léostic C, Barra J A, Le Niger C
Service de santé publique, hygiène et évaluation, CHU de Morvan, 29609 Brest cedex, France.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2004 Jul;11(3):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2004.04.001.
Blood transfusion, like any effective therapy, involves an element of risk. In order to reduce such risks to a maximum, a legislative and statutory framework has been set up. A reliable evaluation of this system is necessary together with an efficient evaluation method whose aim is to guarantee quality service. Favouring the development of the evaluation of professional practices is one of the priorities of the National Agency of Accreditation and Evaluation in Health (ANAES) created in April 1996. Following the recommendations from ANAES, the University Hospital of Brest decided to set up an evaluation of blood transfusion chain from the prescription of blood products to the transfusion act and follow-up of receivers in two health care services. The method used for this evaluation was a clinical audit. It is a method of evaluation, which allows with the help of certain criteria, care practices to be compared to accepted references, in order to measure the quality of these practices and the results of hospital care, so that improvements may be added. We present here the method and results of this evaluation, as well as the improvements we have put in place.
输血与任何有效的治疗方法一样,都存在一定风险。为了将此类风险降至最低,已建立了一个立法和法规框架。对该系统进行可靠评估以及采用旨在确保优质服务的有效评估方法是很有必要的。促进专业实践评估的发展是1996年4月成立的国家卫生认证与评估机构(ANAES)的优先事项之一。根据ANAES的建议,布雷斯特大学医院决定在两项医疗服务中,对从血液制品处方到输血行为以及受血者随访的输血链进行评估。此次评估采用的方法是临床审计。这是一种评估方法,借助某些标准,可将护理实践与公认的参考标准进行比较,以衡量这些实践的质量和医院护理的结果,从而进行改进。我们在此展示此次评估的方法、结果以及我们所采取的改进措施。