Spaak Jonas, Montmerle Stéphanie, Sundblad Patrik, Linnarsson Dag
Sect. of Environmental Physiology, Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Feb;98(2):648-54. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01332.2003. Epub 2004 Oct 22.
Long-term head-down-tilt bed rest (HDT) causes cardiovascular deconditioning, attributed to reflex dysfunctions, plasma volume reduction, or cardiac impairments. Our objective with the present study was to evaluate the functional importance and relative contribution of these during rest and exercise in supine and upright postures. We studied six subjects before (baseline), during [days 60 (D60) and 113 (D113)], and after [recovery days 0 (R0), 3 (R3), and 15 (R15)] 120 days of -6 degrees HDT. We determined cardiac output, stroke volume (SV), mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during rest and exercise in supine and upright postures. Cardiac output and SV decreased significantly in all four conditions, but the time courses differed for rest and exercise. Upright resting SV was decreased by 24 +/- 9% at D60 compared with baseline but had recovered already at R3. Supine exercise SV decreased more slowly (by 5 +/- 8% at D60 and by 18 +/- 4% at D113) and recovered more slowly after HDT termination. Steady-state mean arterial pressure showed no changes. Heart rate had increased by 18 +/- 4% at D60 and had recovered partially at R3. Our data indicate that long-term HDT causes both a rapid, preload-dependent reduction in SV, most evident during rest in the upright position, and a more slowly developing cardiac dysfunction, most evident during supine exercise. However, the ability to maintain blood pressure and to perform sustained low levels of dynamic exercise is not influenced by HDT.
长期头低位卧床休息(HDT)会导致心血管功能失调,这归因于反射功能障碍、血浆量减少或心脏功能受损。我们开展本研究的目的是评估这些因素在仰卧位和直立位休息及运动期间的功能重要性和相对贡献。我们研究了6名受试者,在-6度HDT 120天之前(基线)、期间[第60天(D60)和第113天(D113)]以及之后[恢复第0天(R0)、第3天(R3)和第15天(R15)]的情况。我们测定了仰卧位和直立位休息及运动期间的心输出量、每搏输出量(SV)、平均动脉压和心率。在所有四种情况下,心输出量和SV均显著下降,但休息和运动的时间进程有所不同。与基线相比,直立位休息时的SV在D60时下降了24±9%,但在R3时已恢复。仰卧位运动时的SV下降较慢(D60时下降5±8%,D113时下降18±4%),HDT终止后恢复也较慢。稳态平均动脉压没有变化。心率在D60时增加了18±4%,在R3时部分恢复。我们的数据表明,长期HDT会导致SV迅速出现与前负荷相关的下降,在直立位休息时最为明显,还会导致心脏功能障碍发展更为缓慢,在仰卧位运动时最为明显。然而,维持血压和进行持续低水平动态运动的能力不受HDT影响。