Suppr超能文献

压痛计与触诊在颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛主诉识别中的比较。

Comparison of algometry and palpation in the recognition of temporomandibular disorder pain complaints.

作者信息

Visscher Corine M, Lobbezoo Frank, Naeije Machiel

机构信息

Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Orofac Pain. 2004 Summer;18(3):214-9.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the construct validity of algometry and to compare it with that of palpation, and to compare tenderness of masticatory muscle sites and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) on palpation and on algometry.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty subjects, 148 with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain complaints, underwent a standardized blinded physical examination that included pain-intensity measures on palpation and pressure pain threshold measures on algometry of masseter muscle sites, temporalis muscle sites, and the TMJ.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis indicated that the recognition of TMD pain complaints based on pressure algometry was comparable to that of palpation (R2 = 0.22 and R2 = 0.21, respectively). The masseter muscles were most tender to palpation and algometry, followed by the TMJs and the temporalis muscles.

CONCLUSION

Construct validity of algometry in the recognition of TMD pain complaints is comparable to that of palpation, and differences in tenderness on palpation and on algometry are found between masticatory muscle sites and the TMJ.

摘要

目的

确定压力痛觉计的结构效度,并将其与触诊的结构效度进行比较,同时比较咀嚼肌部位和颞下颌关节(TMJ)在触诊和压力痛觉计测量时的压痛情况。

方法

250名受试者,其中148名有颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)疼痛主诉,接受了标准化的盲法体格检查,包括对咬肌部位、颞肌部位和TMJ进行触诊时的疼痛强度测量以及压力痛觉计测量的压力疼痛阈值测量。

结果

逻辑回归分析表明,基于压力痛觉计对TMD疼痛主诉的识别与触诊相当(分别为R2 = 0.22和R2 = 0.21)。咬肌在触诊和压力痛觉计测量时压痛最明显,其次是TMJ和颞肌。

结论

压力痛觉计在识别TMD疼痛主诉方面的结构效度与触诊相当,并且在咀嚼肌部位和TMJ之间发现了触诊和压力痛觉计测量时压痛的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验