Suppr超能文献

内脏利什曼病的诊断:传统方法与巢式聚合酶链反应检测的敏感性和特异性

Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: the sensitivities and specificities of traditional methods and a nested PCR assay.

作者信息

Gatti S, Gramegna M, Klersy C, Madama S, Bruno A, Maserati R, Bernuzzi A M, Cevini C, Scaglia M

机构信息

Laboratory of Parasitology, Virology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Taramelli, 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004 Oct;98(7):667-76. doi: 10.1179/000349804225011488.

Abstract

In the present study, 67 patients suspected to be cases of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) were each checked for leishmanial infection by the microscopical evaluation of various biological specimens, in-vitro culture, serology and an assay based on nested PCR. Most (35) of the subjects were immunocompetent (IC) but 32 were immunodeficient (ID) as the result of HIV infection (18 cases), treatment to prevent transplanted organs being rejected (six) or haematological malignancies (eight). Forty-one (61.2%) of the subjects (19 IC subjects, 12 HIV-positive patients, four transplant patients and six patients with malignancies) were considered true cases of VL. For the IC subjects, only the production and microscopical examination of leucocytoconcentrates and cultures of Buffy coats gave sensitivities of <80%, the results of the other methods showing higher sensitivities and almost perfect agreement with the 'gold-standard' diagnoses. For the ID subjects, however, only the serological tests and the PCR gave reasonable sensitivities (of >80%). For the initial diagnosis of leishmaniasis in ID patients, IFAT and western blots may be useful, as, among the present ID patients, they gave sensitivities (of 80.9% and 88.2%, respectively) that were almost as high as that for the PCR, and specificities of 100%. In the diagnosis of VL in either IC or ID patients, the assay based on a nested PCR appeared to be particularly reliable, with sensitivities of 88.9% and 95.2%, respectively, and a specificity of 100% in both groups of patients. The testing of bone-marrow aspirates by PCR revealed very few VL cases who were not found positive when samples of their peripheral blood were checked in the same assay. For both IC and ID subjects therefore, the use of the PCR-based method to test samples of peripheral blood (which can be collected much more easily than bone-marrow aspirates and with much less pain for the subject) is recommended.

摘要

在本研究中,对67例疑似内脏利什曼病(VL)的患者,分别通过对各种生物标本进行显微镜评估、体外培养、血清学检测以及基于巢式PCR的检测方法来检查利什曼原虫感染情况。大多数(35例)受试者免疫功能正常(IC),但32例因感染HIV(18例)、接受预防移植器官排斥的治疗(6例)或患有血液系统恶性肿瘤(8例)而免疫功能低下(ID)。41例(61.2%)受试者(19例免疫功能正常者、12例HIV阳性患者、4例移植患者和6例恶性肿瘤患者)被认为是VL确诊病例。对于免疫功能正常的受试者,仅白细胞浓缩物的制备及显微镜检查和血沉棕黄层培养的敏感性<80%,其他方法的结果显示出更高的敏感性,并且与“金标准”诊断几乎完全一致。然而,对于免疫功能低下的受试者,只有血清学检测和PCR具有合理的敏感性(>80%)。对于免疫功能低下患者利什曼病的初步诊断,间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)和免疫印迹法可能有用,因为在目前的免疫功能低下患者中,它们的敏感性(分别为80.9%和88.2%)几乎与PCR的敏感性一样高,且特异性均为100%。在免疫功能正常或免疫功能低下患者的VL诊断中,基于巢式PCR的检测方法似乎特别可靠,两组患者的敏感性分别为88.9%和95.2%,特异性均为100%。通过PCR检测骨髓穿刺液发现,在相同检测中,外周血样本检测为阴性的VL病例极少。因此,对于免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下的受试者,均推荐使用基于PCR的方法检测外周血样本(与骨髓穿刺液相比,外周血样本采集更容易,受试者痛苦更小)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验