Kanis J A, Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Eisman J A, McCloskey E V, Mellstrom D, Melton L J, Pols H A P, Reeve J, Silman A J, Tenenhouse A
Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases (WHO Collaborating Centre), University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Bone. 2004 Nov;35(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.06.017.
The aims of the present study were to determine whether a parental history of any fracture or hip fracture specifically are significant risk factors for future fracture in an international setting, and to explore the effects of age, sex and bone mineral density (BMD) on this risk. We studied 34,928 men and women from seven prospectively studied cohorts followed for 134,374 person-years. The cohorts comprised the EPOS/EVOS study, CaMos, the Rotterdam Study, DOES and cohorts at Sheffield, Rochester and Gothenburg. The effect of family history of osteoporotic fracture or of hip fracture in first-degree relatives, BMD and age on all clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture risk alone was examined using Poisson regression in each cohort and for each sex. The results of the different studies were merged from the weighted beta coefficients. A parental history of fracture was associated with a modest but significantly increased risk of any fracture, osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture in men and women combined. The risk ratio (RR) for any fracture was 1.17 (95% CI=1.07-1.28), for any osteoporotic fracture was 1.18 (95% CI=1.06-1.31), and for hip fracture was 1.49 (95% CI=1.17-1.89). The risk ratio was higher at younger ages but not significantly so. No significant difference in risk was seen between men and women with a parental history for any fracture (RR=1.17 and 1.17, respectively) or for an osteoporotic fracture (RR=1.17 and 1.18, respectively). For hip fracture, the risk ratios were somewhat higher, but not significantly higher, in men than in women (RR=2.02 and 1.38, respectively). A family history of hip fracture in parents was associated with a significant risk both of all osteoporotic fracture (RR 1.54; 95CI=1.25-1.88) and of hip fracture (RR=2.27; 95% CI=1.47-3.49). The risk was not significantly changed when BMD was added to the model. We conclude that a parental history of fracture (particularly a family history of hip fracture) confers an increased risk of fracture that is independent of BMD. Its identification on an international basis supports the use of this risk factor in case-finding strategies.
本研究的目的是确定在国际背景下,任何骨折或特定的髋部骨折家族史是否是未来骨折的重要危险因素,并探讨年龄、性别和骨密度(BMD)对该风险的影响。我们研究了来自七个前瞻性队列的34928名男性和女性,随访时间达134374人年。这些队列包括EPOS/EVOS研究、CaMos、鹿特丹研究、DOES以及谢菲尔德、罗切斯特和哥德堡的队列。在每个队列中,针对每种性别,使用泊松回归分析一级亲属中骨质疏松性骨折或髋部骨折家族史、骨密度和年龄对所有临床骨折、骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折风险的单独影响。不同研究的结果通过加权β系数进行合并。父母有骨折史与男性和女性总体上发生任何骨折、骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折的风险适度但显著增加相关。任何骨折的风险比(RR)为1.17(95%CI = 1.07 - 1.28),任何骨质疏松性骨折的风险比为1.18(95%CI = 1.06 - 1.31),髋部骨折的风险比为1.49(95%CI = 1.17 - 1.89)。风险比在年轻时较高,但差异不显著。有父母骨折史的男性和女性在任何骨折(RR分别为1.17和1.17)或骨质疏松性骨折(RR分别为1.17和1.18)方面的风险没有显著差异。对于髋部骨折,男性的风险比略高于女性,但差异不显著(RR分别为2.02和1.38)。父母有髋部骨折家族史与所有骨质疏松性骨折(RR 1.54;95CI = 1.25 - 1.88)和髋部骨折(RR = 2.27;95%CI = 1.47 - 3.49)的显著风险相关。当将骨密度添加到模型中时,风险没有显著变化。我们得出结论,父母骨折史(尤其是髋部骨折家族史)会增加骨折风险,且该风险独立于骨密度。在国际范围内识别这一因素支持在病例发现策略中使用这一危险因素。