Suppr超能文献

使用四种粘结剂的Procera全瓷冠的边缘适合性和微渗漏

Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.

作者信息

Albert Francine E, El-Mowafy Omar M

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):529-35.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of different cements on microleakage and marginal adaptation of porcelain crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty extracted molars were divided into two groups. Teeth in one group were prepared to receive Procera AllCeram crowns, whereas the other group was prepared to receive metal-ceramic crowns. Copings were made following standard techniques, and groups were divided for cementation with zinc phosphate, glass-ionomer, resin-modified glassionomer, or resin cement. Specimens were subjected to thermocycling prior to microleakage testing, then sectioned. Microleakage was scored using a five-point scale; marginal adaptation was assessed with a traveling microscope.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between cement type and degree of microleakage. With zinc phosphate, 76% of Procera AllCeram and 90% of metal-ceramic copings exhibited extensive microleakage. With glass-ionomer, 49% of Procera AllCeram and 66% of metal-ceramic copings had 0 microleakage scores; with resin-modified glass-ionomer, 10% of Procera AllCeram and 84% of metal-ceramic copings had 0 microleakage scores. With resin cement, 34% of Procera AllCeram and 96% of metal-ceramic copings exhibited 0 microleakage. Procera AllCeram copings had a significantly larger mean marginal gap (54 microm) compared to metal ceramic (29 microm).

CONCLUSION

In both types of crowns, the use of resin cement resulted in the highest percentage of 0 microleakage scores, whereas the zinc phosphate cement resulted in the highest percentage of extensive microleakage.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了不同粘固剂对烤瓷冠微渗漏及边缘适合性的影响。

材料与方法

80颗拔除的磨牙被分为两组。一组牙齿预备后制作Procera全瓷冠,另一组预备后制作金属烤瓷冠。按照标准技术制作内冠,然后将两组再分别用磷酸锌粘固剂、玻璃离子粘固剂、树脂改良玻璃离子粘固剂或树脂粘固剂进行粘固。在进行微渗漏测试前,对样本进行热循环处理,然后切片。微渗漏采用五点计分法;边缘适合性用移动显微镜进行评估。

结果

发现粘固剂类型与微渗漏程度之间存在显著关联。使用磷酸锌粘固剂时,76%的Procera全瓷内冠和90%的金属烤瓷内冠出现广泛微渗漏。使用玻璃离子粘固剂时,49%的Procera全瓷内冠和66%的金属烤瓷内冠微渗漏评分为0;使用树脂改良玻璃离子粘固剂时,10%的Procera全瓷内冠和84%的金属烤瓷内冠微渗漏评分为0。使用树脂粘固剂时,34%的Procera全瓷内冠和96%的金属烤瓷内冠微渗漏评分为0。Procera全瓷内冠的平均边缘间隙(54微米)显著大于金属烤瓷内冠(29微米)。

结论

在两种类型的冠中,使用树脂粘固剂导致微渗漏评分为0的比例最高,而磷酸锌粘固剂导致广泛微渗漏的比例最高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验