Hay Benjamin P, Werner Eric J, Raymond Kenneth N
Chemical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Bioconjug Chem. 2004 Nov-Dec;15(6):1496-502. doi: 10.1021/bc0498370.
Two literature computational methods for the prediction of the number of inner-sphere aqua ligands, q, have been applied to a test set of seven Gd(aminocarboxylate) complexes. The first method is based on the hypothesis that q should be proportional to the solvent-accessible surface area of the ligand-complexed Gd ion (Castonguay, L. A., Treasurywala, A. M., Caulfield, T. J., Jaeger, E. P., and Kellar, K. E. (1999) Prediction of q-Values and Conformations of Gadolinium Chelates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 10, 958). The second method is based on the hypothesis that q-values can be deduced by examining series of steric energy versus ionic radii plots as a function of coordination number (Reichert, D. E., Hancock, R. D., and Welch, M. J. (1996) Molecular Mechanics Investigation of Gadolinium(III) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 35, 7013). This study identifies deficiencies in these methods and, with respect to the first method, describes some apparent errors. Although neither method was reliable at predicting q, two alternate approaches based on either molecular mechanics strain thresholds or exposed Gd surface area thresholds are shown to predict observed q-values for all Gd aminocarboxylate complexes in the test set.
两种用于预测内界水合配体数量q的文献计算方法已应用于一组包含7种钆(氨基羧酸盐)配合物的测试集。第一种方法基于这样的假设:q应与配体络合钆离子的溶剂可及表面积成正比(卡斯通圭,L.A.,特雷asurywala,A.M.,考尔菲尔德,T.J.,耶格尔,E.P.,以及凯拉尔,K.E.(1999年)用于磁共振成像的钆螯合物q值和构象的预测。生物共轭化学。10,958)。第二种方法基于这样的假设:通过检查作为配位数函数的一系列空间能与离子半径图,可以推导出q值(赖歇特,D.E.,汉考克,R.D.,以及韦尔奇,M.J.(1996年)钆(III)配合物的分子力学研究。无机化学。35,7013)。本研究指出了这些方法的不足之处,并且就第一种方法而言,描述了一些明显的错误。尽管这两种方法在预测q时都不可靠,但基于分子力学应变阈值或暴露的钆表面积阈值的两种替代方法被证明可以预测测试集中所有钆氨基羧酸盐配合物的观测q值。