Beadle-Brown Julie, Murphy Glynis, Wing Lorna
University of Kent at Canterbury, Tizard Centre, Kent CT2 7LZ.
Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Jan;110(1):1-12. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110<1:LOFPWS>2.0.CO;2.
Results from a 25-year follow-up study of the Camberwell Cohort (L. Wing & Gould, 1978, 1979) were presented. Ninety-one people, ranging in age from 27 to 41 years, were traced, and an outcome measure was developed incorporating independent functioning, residential placement, employment, and quality of life. Outcome was rated as either poor (53%) or fair (43%), with only 3% having a good outcome. Using logistic regression methods, we found that the best predictor of outcome was social impairment, with those who were socially impaired, particularly those in the aloof category, having a poorer outcome. Higher IQ at Time 1 and lower challenging behavior were also predictive of better outcome. An in-depth look at social impairment revealed that social impairment remained stable over time.
展示了对坎伯韦尔队列进行的一项为期25年随访研究的结果(L. 温 & 古尔德,1978年,1979年)。追踪了91名年龄在27至41岁之间的人,并制定了一项结果测量指标,该指标纳入了独立功能、居住安置、就业和生活质量。结果被评为差(53%)或一般(43%),只有3%的结果良好。使用逻辑回归方法,我们发现结果的最佳预测因素是社会功能障碍,社会功能受损的人,尤其是那些属于冷漠类别的人,结果较差。时间1时较高的智商和较低的挑战行为也预示着更好的结果。对社会功能障碍的深入研究表明,社会功能障碍随时间保持稳定。