Wichelhaus Andrea, Brauchle Gert, Mertmann Matthias, Sander Franz Günter
Department of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Basle, Switzerland.
J Orofac Orthop. 2004 Nov;65(6):501-11. doi: 10.1007/s00056-004-0417-9.
The aim of this study was to investigate the corrosion resistance of orthodontic pliers from several manufacturers following different sterilization procedures, namely heat sterilization and the use of a disinfectant agent (Sekusept Extra N in an ultrasonic bath.
Employed in this study were ten distal-end cutters and ten Weingart pliers manufactured by Aesculap, ETM and Hu-Friedy, examined under electron microscopy for evidence of corrosion following 500 sterilization cycles. The corrosion data were recorded photographically and graphically. Metallographic microsections were prepared from each pair of pliers and were then analyzed by means of EDX measurements to assess the chemical alloy composition.
The light and electron microscopic evaluation showed that both heat sterilization and high level disinfection caused corrosive changes on the pliers. However, the type of corrosion differed between the two sterilization methods. The main type of corrosion with Sekusept Extra N was pitting, while with heat sterilization it was surface corrosion. Heat sterilization was the type of corrosion that caused the most corrosive changes, regardless of which type of corrosion was considered. However, these results must be viewed critically, because pitting corrosion is obviously a more severe problem than surface corrosion. In comparing the pliers of various manufacturers, differences were noted. However, it was difficult to rank them when the correct maintenance regime was adhered to. The soldered joint gap was revealed to be a specific weak point, and that area proved to be inadequate due to qualities related to their production, particularly in the Hu-Friedy pliers.
This study showed that heat sterilization leads to less corrosion than cold disinfection. Corroded pliers can be restored to a useable condition by re-polishing, though it is important that the instructions for their care be strictly adhered to.
本研究旨在调查不同制造商生产的正畸钳在不同灭菌程序(即热灭菌和使用消毒剂(在超声波浴中使用Sekusept Extra N))后的耐腐蚀性。
本研究使用了由蛇牌、ETM和胡氏(Hu-Friedy)生产的10把末端切断钳和10把魏氏钳(Weingart pliers),在经过500次灭菌循环后,通过电子显微镜检查腐蚀迹象。腐蚀数据通过摄影和图表记录。从每把钳子上制备金相切片,然后通过能谱仪(EDX)测量进行分析,以评估化学合金成分。
光学和电子显微镜评估表明,热灭菌和高水平消毒都会导致钳子出现腐蚀变化。然而,两种灭菌方法的腐蚀类型不同。使用Sekusept Extra N时的主要腐蚀类型是点蚀,而热灭菌时是表面腐蚀。无论考虑哪种腐蚀类型,热灭菌都是导致最严重腐蚀变化的腐蚀类型。然而,这些结果必须谨慎看待,因为点蚀显然比表面腐蚀更严重。在比较不同制造商的钳子时,发现了差异。然而,当遵循正确的维护方案时,很难对它们进行排名。焊接间隙被发现是一个特定的薄弱点,并且由于其生产相关的质量问题,该区域被证明是不合格的,特别是在胡氏钳中。
本研究表明,热灭菌比冷消毒导致的腐蚀更少。虽然严格遵守护理说明很重要,但腐蚀的钳子可以通过重新抛光恢复到可用状态。